• PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    47
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think this article( and by extension you guys) are misrepresenting the pragerU clip. All its said was at the time, slavery was prevalent across the globe and it was “no big deal” for their societies of their time.

    Who is to say that we arent going to look back and treat the prison system the same way or we would classify terminal online as slavery to corporations. Obviously slavery was inhumane but the people at the time didnt see it that way.

    • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Obviously slavery was inhumane but the people at the time didnt see it that way.

      You can’t think of a segment of the population that did see it that way? The people who were enslaved, or abolitionists perhaps?

    • ymhr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think it was quite a big deal to the slaves, even at the time.

    • Frog-Brawler@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I do not agree with your interpretation whatsoever, but to argue that slavery was “no big deal” at the time is also factually invalid.

    • Bipta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      A large number of people did see it as inhumane.

      Also, right before that part they further normalize slavery, which often involved intermittent torture to keep them in line:

      Being taken as a slave is better than being killed, no?

    • Whiskey Pickle@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      people who own slaves rarely think what they’re doing is wrong, especially because it benefits them so much. the slaves, on the other hand, rarely see it the same way.

      abolitionist movements and slave revolts go back to Ancient Rome and before. Ever heard of Spartacus? wow…

    • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      No lol there were abolitionists before Columbus’s voyage. People have always been capable of grasping how evil it is. They intentionally chose to ignore that aspect of their perception to maximize their profits.

      • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well, didn’t the clergy with a medieval mindset actually fight for natives’ rights? Think of Bartolomé de las Casas

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      Child and marital rape were “no big deal” across the globe for thousands of years. Should we teach that to children as well?

      • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well, if we want to contextualise some periods it should. Like, imagine someone told you 40 year olds married 14 year olds without giving you the context of the period

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Oh look, the education system is already working as intended.

    • dmention7@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why may it have been considered “no big deal” at the time?

      Because the people who thought that way believed that the people being enslaved were literally sub-human.

      So the question is still why is it relevant in any context whether slavery was considered acceptable at the time?

      • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It was normalised across the globe throughout human history. That is, I suppose, a valid point. Although I would say it’s a pretty big deal that it was normalised across the globe throughout human history. And of course, there’s more slaves today than there was during the entire period of the Atlantic slave trade, which is horrific and barely discussed.

      • LemmyBemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Slavery is still rampant worldwide and is involved in the production of many goods that end up on us soil. How do you feel about your smart phone and cheap gadgets?

        • dmention7@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Is that seriously supposed to be some kind of “gotcha”?

          Does that mean you believe slavery is morally justified, or did you type out that post from your typewriter? Gottem

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Who is to say that we arent going to look back and treat the prison system the same way or we would classify terminal online as slavery to corporations.

      Then I will accept that judgement. Why do we need to forgive the past for it’s wrongs just out of fear for being judged ourselves?

    • manofnyan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Just to be clear, slavery is 100% legal in the United States if it is punishment for a crime. Read the 13th amendment. Many people already see the prison system as an abhorrent extension of slavery. Legally speaking, it literally is.

      Also, Christopher Columbus was tried in Spain and imprisoned for his atrocities in America. There was never a point in time where slavery was unanimously accepted. Institutional racism was born because enslavement between two equal humans is so clearly wrong. Slavery was so clearly a big deal that one party needed to be dehumanized to justify it.