• IHave69XiBucks@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Youd be surprised how many of them there are. Lots of airfare these days already costs thousands of dollars. Im not in that tax bracket but i know there are lots of people with just heeps of money to burn. My guess is this would just be the new first class. Not only is your seat better its on a different plane and you get there faster.

    • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      True, but now you’ve just invented the Concorde problem again. How are you going to fill enough seats on a daily/weekly basis to justify a route? That’s if you even manage to make this economical.

      Concorde was killed by the internet as major businesses could simply have a video call or email conference instead of needing to send physical delegates to major financial capitals. That took away their core repeat customer base, and they weren’t able to recover past that point. Who will be the main customer base for this?

      • IHave69XiBucks@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Your wrong about why the Concorde failed. This isnt the Concorde. The Concorde had horrible range, and fuel efficiency and it wasnt very fast compared to a suborbital flight either. You couldnt even get to the west coast from NYC with it before it ran out of fuel. Plus it had horrible sonic booms that people under it couldnt stand so it was only flown over water usually. This is an entirely different aircraft they did not just recreate the Concorde. The only similarity is that its a supersonic plane meant for civilian use. I am not an expert on this plane but i think it would be a mistake to assume the designers of this plane weren’t aware of the concordes failures. They wouldn’t make it if it didnt have a atleast plausible use case. We will see if it fails or not tho in the future.