• archonet
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    20 days ago

    Conservatives are happier? Since when?

    Like, I can disprove that by turning on Fox News for two minutes. It’s nothing but 24/7 anger porn and rage bait.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Maybe it’s got the effect to externalise any of the sources of whatever is wrong in your life. Fox gives you easy answers for all your problems, and it’s always some ‘other’. You don’t have to change or work on yourself to improve things, you just have to vote for the guys that will deport/jail the ones holding you back.

      • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        20 days ago

        Id pay special attention to Study 4 which seems to really hit my key points of criticism as a layman. Study 4 controlled for census region but I’d really like to see this controlled for rural vs urban populations at a finer scale. Without that adjustment I question the validity of other studies included.

        That said study 4, if I’m reading it right, still found a correlation with happiness in conservatives but that correlation did not survive when religion was accounted for. Which tells you everything you need to know.

        The conservatism isn’t the primary ideology, this is just a roundabout way of asking if religious people report being happier and having more meaning and of course they do. The religious aspect almost overrules the political angle entirely.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      20 days ago

      You know how people in groups tend to do pretty bad stuff without reflection and proper teaching, like bullying and excluding others?

      That’s because it feels good to do these things, as long as you shield yourself from the negative consequences. It doesn’t feel good once you develop real empathy, but until that point doing these things will make you happy.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        You can’t develop empathy until you break out of the filter bubble. To understand a person you first need to know what their life is like, what motivates them, what values they hold.

        Everything I’ve seen tells me that the opacity runs in both directions. Empathizing with someone who holds radically different, diametrically opposed values to your own is very difficult.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          No, I disagree. I have empathy for all humans, no matter who. When I hear that some natural catastrophe occurs, I don’t need to know details about those affected to feel for them. There was a time when I was a child when that wasn’t true, but since some point in my childhood it is.

          That coincided with the point in time when I started leaning very left.

          • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            That’s not what empathy means. Empathy is the capacity to put yourself in someone else’s shoes and understand how they are feeling, not to feel bad for them when they’re not doing well.

            What you’re describing is more like sympathy.

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              20 days ago

              Yes, and I don’t need to know the details of someone’s life to do so. Do you? You can’t feel empathy for e.g. Floridians who recently went through that hurricane?

              not to feel bad for them when they’re not doing well

              That’s also a form of empathy. You get that, right?

              • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                20 days ago

                That’s also a form of empathy. You get that, right?

                No, because doing badly doesn’t imply feeling badly. People going through bad times respond in a variety of ways. They don’t all respond exactly the same way.

                Of course you can respond by donating to help people who have been affected by a disaster. Everyone does that. That’s what sympathy does for us.

                Empathy is different! To truly have empathy for someone means to understand them well enough to know how they’re going to respond to something even before they do. It’s very difficult to achieve. Many married couples never reach it.

                • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  So you’re claiming that most people never have empathy for other people… Sure, that sounds very realistic and not-at-all “holier than thou”.

                  I mean, I’ve seen plenty of examples where other people have empathized with me, but I guess I just happen to be surrounded by living incarnations of Buddha himself.

              • floofloof@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                20 days ago

                You get that, right?

                I wonder how it feels to be talked to like this.

                • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  How should I know? I don’t know chonglibloodsport enough to know how they’re going to respond to something even before they do.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        That’s also the behavior of profoundly unhappy people. I think the real issue is that these are the Republicans answering 10/10 on happiness in the polls:

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    Ignorance is Bliss. I too would be happier if I thought all the people destroying the planet were the good guys.

  • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    Really? Because most cons and tepubs I meet are the angriest miserable people I interact with, constantly pissed at the most insignificant mild inconveniences imaginable and always finding ways to make themselves the victim

    • ivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      19 days ago

      It’s both. Indoctrination is a complex bitch. I grew up (quite) religious and was definitely “happier” in some sense when I could just easily dismiss every real, major problem/injustice in life with some glib, simplistic talking point or Bible verse. To say nothing of the confidence and self-assuredness that goes along with “knowing the truth” and being on the “good side/team,” not like those wordly sinners over there.

      It IS much easier and comfortable that way. Deep down, I was utterly miserable, but it took a long time to understand that and see through it all.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 days ago

        That’s could be just exposure to the internet, which turns everyone into a wretched and miserable gremlin.

        • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Sure, and not just that. Most, if not all people I know of whom I’d consider a ‘normal’ don’t spend time commenting on social media. By definition, everything we read on here comes from this self-selecting group of people who do not represent the majority.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    Yes. Stupid people are happier people. Conservatives are thoughtlessly optimistic about their own futures, even while voting to destroy them.

    • isles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      19 days ago

      Sometimes, the point of research is to experimentally prove things we suspect are true.

      • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        ho dè anexétastos bíos ou biōtòs anthrṓpōi

        ~ Socrates

        The unexamined life is not worth living

  • forrgott@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    20 days ago

    Wow, what bullshit. Cognitive dissonance may give the appearance of happiness, but it is a literal hell on Earth. The psychological damage from pretending so strongly to be happy…? It’s not worth it.

    And besides, no one is going to convince me that the people that are always afraid and angry are the happy ones.

    • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      20 days ago

      And you’re a professional with a degree and career to back that up?

      Oh no, you’ll ignore this because it makes you happier! And the circle of life is complete.

          • forrgott@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            Do you ignore things to make yourself happy? I guess that would explain why you would assume somebody else would. But, sorry to disappoint - I’m not a Republican.

            And, no, I don’t ignore even the insane shit out there. What’s the point? Besides, what kind of fucked up system do you use to decide if you’re happy anyway? Ignore shit and it’s still true.

            Anyway, I’ve never met a happy Republican. As I said, they’re always afraid and/or angry. So, yeah, not hard to figure out that the study this article is referencing is bullshit. But you do you.

            But my claim must be absurd! Cause you know you’re happy! Whatever, dude…

            • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              19 days ago

              You’ve completely discounted actual science with the way you THINK it works. Do you really not understand the parallel?

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Conservatives are likely just more emotional in general, their lives seem to be more dominated by emotions. Happiness, fear, anger, they just live in these extremes without any real thought about the reasons behind it. They just get triggered by whatever buzzwords the Party trots out for them, without any real mental analysis or realization of the manipulation that’s going on.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 days ago

      without any real mental analysis or realization of the manipulation that’s going on.

      I see it as zero introspection. That might also explain the projection, hate, and bigotry that run in those circles; it’s hard to keep that up once you see where it’s coming from. An inability to introspect is also an aspect (among many) of narcissistic personality disorder, and helps keep that pain-train rolling.

  • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    The word is “blithe”, and it’s more often a conscious choice then an inborn default, ergo: Nazi apologists are simply called Nazis.

  • ieightpi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    19 days ago

    This makes a lot of sense actually. Conservative values represent upholding the status quo and at this exact moment that is how society works. So in the moment they see society following their values which makes them happy.

    Progressives and Liberals are programmatic and critical of society and see things that could be better. That inherently makes you less happy with what’s going on around you since you can imagine a better world.

    Yes ignorance is indeed bliss when it comes to being conservative.

      • ieightpi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        Fair point. I should not have grouped Progressives with Liberals. But in the current US political landscape, Liberals tend to move policy forward even if they are only tiny incremental changes.

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          I should not have grouped Progressives

          I’m not sure why people use the term “progressive” - it seems to simply refer to liberals that don’t want to be associated with their far-right cousins, but also don’t want to give up on liberalism (which has always been a right-wing ideology) and actually move left. Just sems like edgy liberalism to me.

          Liberals tend to move policy forward

          Not really. When people were calling for fascist institutions to be defunded, Biden responded by upping their budget and putting a thousand more fascist goons on the streets. That’s not “forward.”