• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    23 hours ago

    No restart require on Linux is a joke, right? Because I get updates that require restarts as often as I get them on Windows when updating Mint.

    • Camille@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Unless you’re updating the kernel itself, there is little chance you actually need to reboot your machine. Just restarting whatever service or application you’re using should do the trick.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Even with kernel updates, you can use something like ksplice or kpatch to update it without rebooting. It’s usually only used on servers though.

        • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Kde neon made me reboot Everytime it updated. Turns out there was a setting I could disable. Afterwards I was never bugged about rebooting.

          Used discover for updates

          Maybe you have such a setting?

        • Camille@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          You do you, it can’t hurt to reboot and work on a fresh restart. But if for some reasons you need to keep your machine up, you’ll know it is less of a problem than on windows typically

      • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        This is the same on Windows, you can just carry on and then complete an update when you go to shut down the machine. Can’t remember the last time an app install or update required the whole OS to be restarted immediately.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I remember what it’s called, but at some point there was an app for windows that would check if your machine actually needed a restart or not. Basically the “restart your machine” prompt is mostly just a boilerplate. It’s very rare that those installers touch anything that can’t actually be loaded without a restart.

    • Blueteabag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Really? I need to restart my Windows less often, Fedora asks me every other day restart my PC to install updates

      • dabster291@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        There should be an option in the settings to disable restarting to apply updates (though I only kno2 it exists on KDE)

        • Blueteabag@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          “Issue” implies that there is something wrong with it it’s simple a different release model, Fedora just got the newer packages, for example Gnome 43 on Debian vs Gnome 47 on Fedora (obviously I’m talking about the stable releases). If you prefer the Debian way of doing things that’s great but I don’t.

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Besides a kernel update… Which one?

      Honest question, as I usually just restart to be sure I haven’t missed to restart a service or something, but theoretically I could restart every program and service, that got updated.

      Maybe Mint is very conservative here…

        • naeap@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Ah yeah, mostly kernel module updates go along with a kernel update. But you are right, yeah.

          Although, should be possible to just reload the module and restart X/Wayland, no?

        • IHateReddit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          they’re not required, only the update manager thing wants you to. if you update via dnf you don’t need to restart 90% of the time

    • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Yep. I’m on EndeavourOS which is about as far as you can get from Mint without going to like Slackware, LFS, or BSD. Basically every single run of pacman prompts for a reboot. I’m sure I could restart individual services or subsystems instead, but that’s not what the OS popup says.

    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Afaik mint just says you have to restart but don’t forces you. Iirc it was there to avoud any glitches which could be caused by apps interacting with each other in different versions(say some system app got updated and desktop environment is still the old since its loaded before update then cause gui mismatch due to different versions of ui toolkit)

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I mean, in this case Windows doesn’t force you to restart either, you can just keep chugging along with the restart icon at the bottom right… That icon can stay there for weeks on my girlfriend’s laptop

        • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          But that is update and restart. The update is not at all installed and will only install if you restart. And it takes a lot of time. But here it is already installed and you can actually reopen apps ti get them in the updated state

      • Despotic Machine@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Redhat is not the original. Just of the ongoing projects, there is both Slackware and Debian, which are both older than Redhat. Redhat stands out because they are a commercial, for profit company, so they have more money and resources to invest in Linux development than most organizations, and they have a vested interest since it is their product base.