BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Legal News@lemmy.zipEnglish · 1 month agoSupreme Court wants US input on whether ISPs should be liable for users’ piracyarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up177arrow-down11file-textcross-posted to: pulse_of_truth@infosec.pubnews@lemmy.world
arrow-up176arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court wants US input on whether ISPs should be liable for users’ piracyarstechnica.comBrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Legal News@lemmy.zipEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square33fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: pulse_of_truth@infosec.pubnews@lemmy.world
SCOTUS asks US government for its view on $1 billion Sony v. Cox case. Case file: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/11/supreme-court-may-decide-whether-isps-must-terminate-users-accused-of-piracy/
minus-squaredoingthestufflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·1 month agoShould car manufacturers be liable for drunk drivers, stolen cars, distracted drivers etc?
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 month agoThat’s a little different. I think auto manufacturers should have regulations that help protect drivers when they’re not driving at their best. Things like seat belts are a simple example.
minus-squaredoingthestufflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThat’s a little regulation, not liability or mandating control of the product’s use.
Should car manufacturers be liable for drunk drivers, stolen cars, distracted drivers etc?
That’s a little different. I think auto manufacturers should have regulations that help protect drivers when they’re not driving at their best. Things like seat belts are a simple example.
That’s a little regulation, not liability or mandating control of the product’s use.