• DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m baised toward tall-earth destructionism myself (infinate to the start of the universe is the only true explanation.) The earth is a chad whom monopolizes all the stacies and doesn’t leave any for the rest of the men.

    • jrs100000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The Earth is probably under 100 years old, since all of the people I personally know and trust are unable to provide first hand confirmation of its existence beyond that time frame.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    There is scientific room for creationism within agnosticism. The drag chute is ignorance.

    • buttfarts
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Young Earth is the culprit. Catholics have been onboard with the big bang since a long time ago

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 hours ago

        a long time ago

        You could say that…what with the theory first being proposed by a Catholic priest (who was also an astronomer, mathematician, and physicist).