☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoChina raises five demands during Yellen’s visitasiatimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square169fedilinkarrow-up126arrow-down116cross-posted to: worldnews@lemmygrad.ml
arrow-up110arrow-down1external-linkChina raises five demands during Yellen’s visitasiatimes.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square169fedilinkcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmygrad.ml
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoYou’ve already forgotten what you were agreeing with. Haha, of course. Directly above. Try to read. Best of luck
minus-squarezephyreks@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoRead about your nonexistent argument? Funny
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoFunny you agreed with it.
minus-squarezephyreks@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoAgreed with…? your nonexistent argument?
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoAh, you’ve forgotten, of course. Here you are: I said that just because everyone’s acting poorly doesn’t make acting poorly right. I used the example of rape, no matter how many people rape, rape is not okay. You agree with me in your following post, that an act is " either ok or it isn’t." Since you agreed with me and conceded the argument in my favor, I thanked you. Thank you for your support.
minus-squarezephyreks@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoSo you missed the entire point of the argument? Nice
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoAnd you still agreed with me?
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoAnd you still agreed with me?
You’ve already forgotten what you were agreeing with. Haha, of course.
Directly above. Try to read. Best of luck
Read about your nonexistent argument? Funny
Funny you agreed with it.
Agreed with…? your nonexistent argument?
Ah, you’ve forgotten, of course. Here you are:
I said that just because everyone’s acting poorly doesn’t make acting poorly right.
I used the example of rape, no matter how many people rape, rape is not okay.
You agree with me in your following post, that an act is " either ok or it isn’t."
Since you agreed with me and conceded the argument in my favor, I thanked you.
Thank you for your support.
So you missed the entire point of the argument? Nice
And you still agreed with me?
You miss the point.
And you still agreed with me?