- cross-posted to:
- movies@lemm.ee
- cross-posted to:
- movies@lemm.ee
The drubbing of the Michelle Yeoh-led streaming film now holds a dubious title—one that reflects something much more interesting than simple schadenfreude.
The drubbing of the Michelle Yeoh-led streaming film now holds a dubious title—one that reflects something much more interesting than simple schadenfreude.
That’s probably because it’s a mediocre movie overall and a horrible star trek movie.
Don’t get me wrong, I didn’t hate it. It had some good bits and pieces, some interesting ideas. But they were cobbled together into a script with the worst dialogue of any trek effort I’ve ever seen. And the fucking accents? Absurdity. Yeoh’s character had this weird one that made the character feel stilted and the “nanokin” accents were just insulting to their respective real world versions.
The action was meh for the most part, though one of the bits with the special gear over the box was kinda fun until the end where a plot point made it turn into nonsense. I avoid spoilers where possible despite thinking spoilers don’t advisor actually spoil anything, so that’s vague as hell, but when you see the movie (if), you’ll get what I mean as soon as you see the bit I’m talking about.
I watched it with my wife and kid because my kid is slowly delving into trek, and this is the newest thing. I said afterward that, as a sci-fi action movie it was okay, I’ve seen a lot worse. But it wasn’t a star trek movie. It was a trek themed movie where they used catchwords from trek canon to make you think of trek, without delivering on the actual feel of any of it.
It definitely deserves to be the lowest rated trek project, and I hate the whole Kelvin thing.
But, again, I didn’t actually hate Section 31. I hated sections of it lol.
Thinking about it as I’m writing this, what it most reminded me of is fan fiction. It was just bad fan fiction. At moments, it also felt like they were going for a ttrpg feel akin to what the d&d honor among thieves movie did. Only in this case, it wasn’t done well.
I dunno, I’m rambling a bit. I think what I’m getting at is that if you’re forced to watch it, there are some decent bits, but you’ll likely be angry at whoever forced you to watch it despite that
Well it was slated as a series, then the main actress became expensive so they shoehorned it into a movie
Yeah. It shows. I think it would have been a shitty series, if that’s the vibe and characters they were going for.
They have to stop thinking that getting rid of Roddenberry’s rules is the way forward, the only way its going to feel like Star Trek is that they accept the positive optimistic version of the future where there is a stronger moral basis to human action. You can do a lot within those rules but you can’t do this type of movie and there are enough generic space movies like this and its just not Star Trek.
They also have to stop being Kurtzman for literally anything related to Star Trek .
That’s essentially where I am.
I don’t mind experimenting with trek, there’s room for it. A lot of ds9 was a divergence. But it was still trek. It was still hopeful and uplifting even at its darkest. It delivered great drama without ignoring the culture of the federation.
Even the TNG movies pushed the boundaries of being trek and doing action without breaking the spirit of the universe.
So it isn’t like you have to throw away all the great parts of trek to put out a great story.
I’ll paraphrase you because you’re so damn right; if we wanted a generic sci-fi/space movie, we could get that anywhere, but you can’t get star trek without playing within that universe and abiding by what makes it carry a sustained “vibe” for over a half century.
There are definitely a few you can fudge on. “Enough Already With the Klingons” was more a rule in the jump from the original series to TNG. Lower Decks proved you can do a good show and still have a little Klingon, as a treat.
But there are so many good notes in the Bible. Liberal use of the Holodeck gets you outside your own genre. Focus on the sociological and psychological consequences of long-term space travel make your protagonists sympathetic and relatable. Exploration as a guiding theme of the franchise means you’re always free to write a novel adventure for your characters to engage in. Some of my favorite “Strange New Worlds” episodes were simply “Crew finds something weird in space” vignettes. And doing the A/B plot divide between the away team and the bridge crew allows for a bit of action-adventure and a bit of high political drama in the same episode.
There’s a reason Roddenberry was the GOAT of Sci-Fi for so long. And why so many subsequent authors pulled generously from his received wisdom. If you’ve got a good playbook, run with it. The fact that ST:TNG and DS9 reruns are still fan favorites decades later should tell you something about how strong a formula he was working with.
About your point about exploring space: The Orville by Seth McFarlane is a very good example of that in a space show like Star Trek. That’s literally their whole mission for the show, and it provides some interesting stories. Like one where they make first contact with a planet similar to ours, but steeped in religious superstition. Or one where they make accidental contact with a planet that only appears in our universe for like 24 hours once every few months, where in its home universe time progresses at an exponential rate, so you see a microcosm of the impact someone could have on an entire civilization.
Also I just genuinely think it’s a good show.
Season 3 was fantastic. The whole shifting alliances arc, with the way their moral principle functioned as a guiding light through the turbulence, felt exactly like the old school utopianism that makes Star Trek uplifting.
Also, really enjoy your they’re not afraid to get weird with the aliens. RIP Norm McDonald. Yaphit was such a fun idea for a character.
The cinematography and directing were also all over the place. The first half of the movie was jarring cuts between close ups of people, and the action scenes - especially the final chase - looked awful.
And why would a spy choose a laughing Vulcan to be inconspicuous? It’s just weird.
Exactly! The entire laughing vulcan with a fake irish accent was dumb. It was just jarring and absurd in a bad way (I generally enjoy absurdist humor).
Sounds to me like it’s the TROS for Star Trek
Somehow… the fans… never returned.