I need a male perspective on this.
My husband and I have a healthy sex life, but lately, Iāve been working a lot of grueling night shifts as a pediatric nurse. Weāve committed to helping his sister with her treatment costs, so Iāve been taking on more shifts to contribute.
On Monday, I worked an 8-hour shift that ended at 6 AM. I got home around 6:30, and Iāll admit I wasnāt the quietest since I had to grab my pajamas from outside. I accidentally woke him up, apologized, and got into bed. He was a little annoyed but started initiating. I told himāgentlyāthat I was exhausted, especially since I had just lost an inpatient. But he was clearly frustrated, and he had to be up for work in two hours, so I ended up going along with it.
We talked the next day, and he admitted heās been feeling frustrated with how often Iāve been turning him down. We used to have sex daily or close to it, but now itās around four times a week since my schedule changed. He told me that āmarital dutiesā arenāt something you can just neglect based on how you feel in the moment and asked how I would react if he just stopped paying the mortgage because he was ātoo tired.ā (For context, I cover about 45% of it, so itās not like Iām not contributing financially.)
I get where heās coming fromāhe has a high libido, and I know intimacy is important. But I didnāt think saying no when Iām sleep-deprived and emotionally drained was unreasonable. That being said, Iāve seen a lot of men on r/deadbedrooms frustrated with the āIām tiredā excuse, so Iām wonderingādo most guys feel this way? Even if a change in circumstances is temporary, does a wife have an obligation to always meet her husbandās needs? Whatās actually a āgoodā reason to say no?
Would really appreciate some honest opinions.
āmarital dutiesā
My male perspective, from that phrase alone, is that heās an asshole.
and asked how I would react if he just stopped paying the mortgage because he was ātoo tired.ā (For context, I cover about 45% of it
And that just further supports my initial assessment.
But I didnāt think saying no when Iām sleep-deprived and emotionally drained was unreasonable.
It wasnāt.
And the fact that you said no should be sufficient all by itself, and not even just as a sign of respect. From a selfish position it should still be sufficient, since nobody with any measure of concern for their partner should be able to enjoy sex they know to be unwilling.
do most guys feel this way?
That I donāt know. I can say that not all do, but especially at this point in time, more than Iād think reasonably possible do.
Thatās sort of immaterial though, since theyāre wrong, and remain wrong no matter how many other assholes agree with them.
Even if a change in circumstances is temporary, does a wife have an obligation to always meet her husbandās needs?
Categorically no.
Now that said, a wife should feel some desire to at least try to accommodate her husband, since thatās the nature of partnership, and depending on ones personality, one might treat that as an āobligation.ā Iām not sure that thatās healthy, but i see no intrinsic problem with it. But an obligation in the externalized sense - something another might reasonably demand of you rather than something you might demand of yourself? Absolutely not, under any circumstances.
Whatās actually a āgoodā reason to say no?
I want to say any reason, but I donāt think thatās quite true.
Iād say any reason thatās internally valid is okay, which is to say, because youāre tired/emotionally drained/physically ill/just not in the mood/etc - anything thatās an honest expression of your emotional/physical/psychological state and the simple degree of desire you feel.
The bad reasons to say no are things that are other-directed - things like the desire to belittle/punish/torment/manipulate/etc. ones partner.
A good reason to say no is when you donāt feel up to it, period. Iāve had similar issues with my partner, so I understand his frustration. However, it stemmed from repeatedly having to initiate and being turned down. So our work around was if I get turned down a couple times in a row, the expectation is that she will then initiate as soon as sheās up for it. I have a high libido too but you still have to understand that your partner may be going through stuff and not take it personal when they say no. Why burn a long term relationship because your partner is having a rough time in the short term?
Also, phrasing it as āwifely dutiesā just feels sorta weird to ick for me.
He told me that āmarital dutiesā arenāt something you can just neglect based on how you feel in the moment and asked how I would react if he just stopped paying the mortgage because he was ātoo tired.ā
Yeah just, borderline inappropriate imo.
Iāve been a husband for almost 20 years now. āI donāt feel like itā is plenty of fucking reason for not having sex. Full stop.
You are under no obligation to provide him with your body whenever he wants it. There are plenty of ways for couples to foster intimacy that arenāt sex.
What would he do if you had cancer and just couldnāt because of treatment?
What would he do if you were in a parasailing accident and in a full body cast?
This behavior is gross, I get having a drive etc. But thatās his problem, not yours.
Remind him heās got a hand (or he can buy a fleshlight) and the internet if heās feeling that frustrated.
It is always okay to say no.
If that means you and your partner are sexually incompatible, you should talk it out and consider what that means for the future of your relationship.
You are completely valid for not wanting to have sex when exhausted, just as your partnerās desire is valid.
Based solely on your side of the story, your partner saying you arenāt fulfilling your marital duties is kind of a red flag. Conservatives tend to make poor partners in general.
Anyway, some couples therapy might help if you can afford it and are at an impasse. But Iād keep an eye out for other red flags you might be subconsciously ignoring/suppressing if I were you.
āwhen is it reasonable to say no to sex?ā
Whenever you donāt feel like it.
Heās not entitled to sex, but that goes both ways. Youāre not entitled to a relationship.
Iāve been in a dead bedroom situation, and it messes with your mind. You begin to believe youāre not attractive, and youāre just a room mate or worse, a free source of money and labor. Easy way for depression to sink in.
Now itās just one day, sure, itās fine. But if it goes on for a while, like for six months or so, I wouldnāt expect to be in a relationship anymore.
HOWEVER, four times a week is a far cry from a dead bedroom. Dude needs to get over it. If it bothers him that much, if he really needs sex every day, thereās porn. And if not, thereās the door.
If he compares sex to paying the mortgage as a āmarital dutyā, then kindly remind him that the reason youāre tired is because youāre working more difficult shifts to financially contribute to the āmarital dutiesā. Heās welcome to pick up more slack himself, sounds like he has plenty of energy.
Nevermind how goddamn icky that phrasing feelsā¦that is highly manipulative language that does not come from a place where your best interests are at heart.
It is always reasonable to say no to sex when you donāt want to have sex. If you arenāt in the mood, you arenāt in the mood.
āMartial duties?ā Dude. Ewwww. You are never obligated to have sex.
The short answer to the post title is: always.
Nobodyās ever entitled to sex, married or otherwise. To me, any other position is a slippery slope into coercion or domestic abuse. A relationship is based on trust if nothing else, and there are some red lines that should never be crossed.
That said, I hate binary arguments as much as the next person, and the key element to navigate the grey area is communication. Iāve worked shifts in the past and gotten home to a partner with the horn, and as much as I love intimacy, it was a case of āsure crack on, but youāre doing all the workā. That said, thereās been times when Iāve been like āabsolutely notā, Iām in no position to ride a bus let alone a partner.
Whatever answer you give is the answer that should be respected. Yes, itās frustrating sometimes but life gets in the way - kids, appointments, longer-than-expected shifts, bereavements, financial pressures (including the conscious decision to work extra), or even mental or physical health in general. It doesnāt affect the answer of whether itās right to say ānoā or not though.
Even if a change in circumstances is temporary, does a wife have an obligation to always meet her husbandās needs? Whatās actually a āgoodā reason to say no?
Iām so sorry to barge in here and answer, because Iām not a man. However, I wanted to chime in because I was once in your position for far too long.
Sex should be a mutual thing between partners. You are not EVER āāāobligatedāāā to give it, nor do you āāāowe itāāā to your partner. Sex is NOT a transactional thing. And if you are being told that is it, you are being lied to. Currently, it seems that it is being weaponized to force you to ignore your needs, simply to fulfill the physical lust of someone else, robbing you of much-needed recovery.
He is not entitled to you. You do not owe him. You can say ānoā for ANY reason and it is absolutely valid.
My opinion would just be a rehash of the comments youāve already gotten, so Iāll spare you that.
Do you have children with this guy? If not, good. He seems to have the outdated idea that you āoweā him sex on demand. Itās especially worrying that he made that mortgage remark the morning after youād both had time to think (AND after heād already gotten what he wanted). Youāre not his sex slave. Heās conveniently ignoring the fact that youāre tired because youāre working extra shifts to help his sister. Iām guessing that heād have a similar attitude after expecting you to raise the children all day, which is why I asked if you had children.
What is his parentās marriage like? Does your father-in-law seem like the dominant one, while your mother-in-law is more passive and submissive? Maybe he just wasnāt raised in an environment where equality mattered.
If you plan on spending the rest of your life with this man, a frank discussion of expectations and boundaries may be uncomfortable, but will ultimately be good for you both.
Sex is not owed and, between romantic partners, is usually not transactional. Either partner should be free to turn it down for any reason whatsoever. Pressuring someone isnāt cool, guilting someone into it is manipulative. I canāt even imagine following through on doing it with someone who wasnāt into it from the start, thatās a total turn off for me and I would feel disgusting afterwards.
āmarital dutiesā
Ew. Talk about inciting āthe ickā.
[ā¦] asked how I would react if he just stopped paying the mortgage because he was ātoo tired.ā
It was wildly inappropriate to bring this up at all. Personally, I see this as a huge red flag for manipulative behavior. I probably would have answered by saying that everybody gets down and needs help from time to time, and that in that situation I would find a way to be financially supportive through that difficult time. Followed by asking what the fuck that has to do with sex.
Your husband presumably has hands. If he needs something with a different texture, there are plenty of products on the market for that.
Making sex into an obligation/chore/work is a great way to sap the fun out of it and fasttrack to a dead bedroom.
Sex isnāt something heās entitled to at any frequency. Full stop. If itās something you both want, and your exhaustion is the only barrier, it might be helpful to have a conversation about how to lower your workload so you have more energy. But any reason is a perfectly valid reason to say no. Of course, thereās the nuance of not holding sex over someoneās head, but it sounds like thatās not whatās happening here.
For context, Iām a man in my late 20s married to a therapist for survivors of domestic violence. My wife frequently gets home exhausted and worn down by the horrible stories she hears. Needless to say, our sex life is quite variable. So I figured out other ways to meet my needs (and I would suggest your husband is capable of the same kind of innovation).
Dude wants to talk about marital duties but you still have to have a job? Shouldnāt his āmarital dutyā be acting as a provider? If youāre going to follow outdated and sexist rules they go both ways.
Thatās a dumb and bullshit excuse, if heās horny and you donāt want to fuck then he should jerk off. Guilt tripping you into sex isnāt cool.