Your way of doing things is now how things must be done. Extra points for petty and minor stuff.

  • davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’ll go for a serious answer.

    When driving, particularly on freeways and highways, everyone must now leave a lot of space between them and the car ahead proportional to how fast they are going - even in heavy traffic. And they must allow a car that is signalling properly to merge into their lane. (But not like a bunch of cars at a time of course)

    Everyone must also start to decelerate as soon as they see brake lights ahead or notice slowing, but they have more space (starting further back in the road), so won’t have to decelerate as strongly as the car ahead is and will reach a higher minimum speed or be stopped for less time when the car ahead starts accelerating again.

    I believe this would mostly end stop-and-go traffic and smooth out all slow traffic (increasing fuel economy and reducing stress) by reducing/eliminating traffic waves. Probably even increase average speeds (but I’m less sure about that)

    • triptrapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      Yes, for a long time I’ve said that traffic jams are caused by brake lights, rather than deceleration alone. If you leave enough space ahead of you, you shouldn’t have to touch your brakes very often, and letting off the gas should be enough.

    • gothic_lemons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      100000% this. I legit think we should run ad campaigns to educate drivers. It’s less stressful, easier on your brakes and your gas tank. If enough ppl did it I legit think it would have a decent little impact for the environment. Going from 0 to 30 to 40 mph, then quickly going back down to 0 has got to burn so much gas than just coasting between 10 and 20 the whole time

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I don’t have a license so I may not know wtf I’m talking about but I’m pretty sure where I live cars already have to keep a certain distance proportional to their speed. If they don’t and they crash into the car in front of them because the driver had to brake suddenly, the driver in the back is liable. We still get congestion and all that nonsense.

      • Albbi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        There’s a big difference between what driver have to do, and what they actually do.