I dont agree with many things apple does at all, and I also think their password manager has flaws like revealing usernames without authentification.

It is pretty handy though, to have a file where the entries are stored unencrypted, and if the password manager detects an entry it prompts to decrypt exactly that field, maybe with a fingerprint.

KeepassDX needs to run in the background and be completely unlocked to even detect apps or password fields.

Do you know any existing app that can do this?

      • Rootiest@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think what they meant is that one option uses network connectivity while the other functions entirely offline

      • Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Which would make it hardly accessible outside of your home. Still not locally saved as well. And imho if he is not sure which password manager he should choose, he should maybe not self host just yet.

        • Ekpu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Bitwarden keeps a local encrypted copy of the database and only connects to the server for synchronisation.

            • Oisteink@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Maybe because it seems you claim self-hosting bit warden is cloud only and that self-hosted is not accessible outside the house?
              Note: I do not recommending self-hosting bitwarden

              • Vexz@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Note: I do not recommending self-hosting bitwarden

                Why not? I have my own instance running on my NAS and I love to have it self-hosted because this way I keep the passwords where I know nobody else can get them.

                • Oisteink@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Because a password manager is critical and if you ask me I’d say no. If you have the know how and understand the risk you won’t be asking

                  • Vexz@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Well, I work in the IT so I know some stuff about security in the digital world. But these systems (password managers in general) are built to be secure and not just tell every password they store without some security measures. Yes, I know there can be security holes, bugs and so on. But that’s why these tools get thoroughly tested.
                    You always have to take risks in the world of computers. So what’s the point? Being as secure as possible? Then better not even bother with password managers at all because they all can have security holes.
                    It’s more about how much you trust a password manager and how much you trust yourself in how cautious you use it. The risk is always there.