What if we never found the Rosetta Stone and could not read ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics. Could computers or AI decipher them today?

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think if you’re trying to model completely agnostically on every language possible translating entire words and existing known pictograms to what they mean. Then there might be a slight chance that kind of deciphering part of it. Just because humans usually come back to similar symbols and maybe it can pick up on something that we can’t. But it would be a long shot to be sure

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The question specified present technology, which is how I answered. I’d guess that an algorithm that can find a reasonable interpretation of any corpus of text in a reasonable time period exists, it’s just it hasn’t been made.

      For really small corpuses there might be more than one interpretation. The Voynich manuscript can probably only be read one way (or zero, but I’ve seen convincing arguments for 1).