Nebraska’s Republican Gov. Jim Pillen on Wednesday signed an executive order strictly defining a person’s sex.

The order notably does not use the term “transgender,” although it appears directed at limiting transgender access to certain public spaces. It orders state agencies to define “female” and “male” as a person’s sex assigned at birth.

“It is common sense that men do not belong in women’s only spaces,” Pillen said in a statement. “As Governor, it is my duty to protect our kids and women’s athletics, which means providing single-sex spaces for women’s sports, bathrooms, and changing rooms.”

  • cmbabul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s because there is no logic, the people that want the government to define sex have a purely emotional reaction to the very existence of trans people… and most things that don’t align with their narrow life experience and worldview

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      10 months ago

      There’s no logic?

      Just because you’re ignorant of the difference between sex and gender are doesn’t mean there isn’t logic…

      Sex is very important for the single biggest thing that affects all of our lives, healthcare. Standardizing it literally saves lives.

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Except the healthcare needs of trans gender people who have medically transitioned to any degree are often closer to their gender than their sex assigned at birth. The body chemistry differences between men and women are primarily affected by hormones. Unless you’re specifically looking at the organs that are different, you probably need to go by gender.

      • I'm back on my BS 🤪@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Again, why is the government involved instead of a letting a leading medical body. Did physicians have a large protest over the lack of a legal definition that is forced outside of medical settings, and the government heard their concerns based on rational logic and ethical medical standards? Does the government define eye color, cancer, gingivitis, premature birth, high IQ, major depressive disorder, and how organizations outside of the medical system can use those terms?