Please help keeping these monsters of our streets. It will save lives.

  • myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Stop being selfish and think of the shareholders! Buy a ridiculously oversized piece of crap truck to impress your neighbors. How else do you show how manly you are?!

  • Devial@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’ve always said that the fines for moving traffic violations need to be scaled to the weight of the vehicle.

    It’s insane that going 20 over the limit on a 250kg moped gets you the exact same fine as doing it in a 4 ton F-450.

    • P1k1e@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This is actually a great idea. IV never considered this. Oh man, EVs would get cooked on fines

      • Devial@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Yeah, it is a downside that this may discourage EV adoption, but tbh. if you chose your car based on the fines you’d get when speeding is…questionable, to say the least.

        “the consequences of doing an illegal and dangerous thing with my product” should, in my opinion, not be a choice criterion.

        Though a scaling that takes both size and weight into account might be even better. Particularly for crashes involving pedestrians, cyclists and bikers, the size, and particulalry the height of the bonnet, are almost more significant than just the raw weight. A hollowed out F-450 weighing 1 ton is probably still more deadly to those people than a ~1.5-2 ton electric sedan.

        This isn’t really aimed at reducing adoption of big cars, more at getting the people who drive more dangerous vehicles, to drive with more regard for safety, and be penalised heavier when they don’t.

    • Rooster326@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The more insane part is that Bezos and that mfer working McDonald’s gets the same fine. It might as well be jail time for one, and a verbal warning for the other.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Except in Finland like with that Nokia executive

        So “cute” we kept our little static fines as if three or four figures mean something to everyone

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yes, please.

      I’m a big bearded white guy and look like I should drive a stupid truck, or at least I would look that way with some shades and a baseball cap. Where I live is pretty white, surrounded by rural areas, so the trucks are everyyywhere. I doubt I need to convince anybody on here that these vehicles are bad, but I have a couple of observations from my perspective here in real america(/s).

      I have a couple of friends who are those rare truck owners due to legitimate need because they are literal farmers, in addition to their day jobs (this is the USA, after all). Not only are their pastures on steep hillsides, but they only have huge animals like horses and cattle so that comes with pulling trailers and hauling bales of hay, etc. The trucks LOOK like they are farm trucks, their back seat areas in the cabs are dedicated to dogs, and the drivers are… petite women. 🤣 They are super nice and generous too, so I get to do the “have a friend with a truck” thing.

      But, since I live close to a Home Depot, I don’t borrow one of the trucks unless I am buying 12+ foot (3.66+ meter) lumber or an appliance.

      Every time I’m at Home Depot in old clothes with cuts on my arms and legs, loading standard 8’ (2.44m) lumber into my decade-old economy sedan, I’m surrounded by people who look like me demographically but are dressed much more cleanly and getting into shiny clean late model luxury SUVs or the hulking pickup trucks that cost even more.

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      And Canada. They’re everywhere here. Idiots only using them to commute to work every day.

      “But I need it” Fuck off.

      • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Here’s a due with a fukken Dodge RAM using it mainly to drive his daughter to school. It’s ~800 meters, and there are hundreds of little kids walking that same route. Way to go, you lazy idiot.

      • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        And Greenland. America as in North America and South America. Also do Afro-Eurasia and Oceania please. Don’t forget Antarctica.

  • paperazzi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Besides the obvious fact these trucks are too huge for European roads and parking spaces, America vehicles are simply hot garbage.

    • noodles@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      The Japanese and Korean vehicles for the American market aren’t any better to be fair.

      • U7826391786239@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        the “newest” car i’ve ever owned is from 2008… are hondas and toyotas really equally as shitty as fucking dodge and chevy now?

        • n4sdaq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t think so. Their comment seems over-generalized. Sure, most modern cars are too “sporty” now which translates to being more uncomfortable in my experience. But that doesn’t mean I’d lump Japanese cars in the same quality category as American cars.

          • noodles@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            I meant that they’re all behemoths rather than quality wise! But yeah, Chevy has improved and is ok now from what I understand, the rest I wouldn’t trust.

        • Horsey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Toyota, particularly, hasn’t kept up with advances in infotainment technology. Their infotainment is literally no better than it was in 08. Honda infotainment is slightly better, but still stuck with terribly low resolution, and only a 9”ish screen. Pretty much any other company will be a better buy than those 2 right now. Remember, the infotainment in every new car is the entire heart of the car, so you’re forced to live with it; you can’t just swap out infotainment screens for something better like you used to be able to do.

          • [deleted]@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            9 inch infotainment is plenty. The purpose of a car is to travel, not watch SpongeBob Squarepants.

            Infotainment replacements are out there, but often lack support for some specific vehicle options. If the connections were more standardized like the old radios it would certainly be nice.

          • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I hate infotainment and technology in cars so, go Toyota!

            Give me efi and maybe abs (most of my cars dont have abs anyway)

            Tech Junk makes all cars more expensive and prone to failure and impossible to repair, and further pushes us to technofacist dystopia where your every move is recorded and your car can be controlled remotely (Tesla can do this already).

          • Taldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Do people actually want infotainment screens?

            The only thing I can think of wanting a screen for is a backup camera. I much prefer buttons when possible. I thought infotainment screens were just a way for manufacturers to save money on buttons. Why would you want one? Is there something I’m missing?

            • Horsey@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              The bigger the screen for me, the safer it is to gaze over at directions. I wouldn’t drive without directions telling me which way is fastest. No way can a human predict traffic better than computers.

              The cameras might not be “required” to drive, but they do increase precision, which in turn is safer overall.

              Also, the last thing I wanna do is know my area super well, then it takes the excitement out of driving around; the engagement is helpful to keep me from being distracted.

              • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                If cars were designed so you actually had visibility, you wouldn’t Need 500 cameras just to reverse.

                This is why 2000s was peak. You had most creature comforts, and tech wasn’t shoved in our faces, and you could actually see out of your car.

            • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              How do you like to get to new places? Turn by turn audio? That mixed with on-screen directions?

              If you like on screen, what is the ideal screen size?

              • Horsey@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                12” widescreen is basically my minimum >15” is ideal. I’d put a 24” in my car if I could.

                • [deleted]@piefed.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Agreed.

                  Having a maps app that shows directions and current position is pretty handy in new areas, especially if there is construction or heavy traffic to avoid.

                • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  Makes me feel better doing that!

                  Still have to check traffic even for short trips since I refuse to waste half an hour in a jam when looking for green/red roads would’ve taken seconds :) then appreciate traffic notifications along the way

                  Admittedly don’t do it with paper but have enjoyed learning roads - even played a game kinda, work to home (San Francisco) where I turned right on red for each red I got, forcing me to explore new places (no GPS)

          • U7826391786239@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            lol “heart of the car” gtfo

            rear view cameras are nice (though unnecessary), but literally NOTHING else about “infotainment” is worth the extra cost. you think it is because you’ve been convinced you just simply can’t survive without it, and cars can’t even exist without it. why? because $$$

            fuck outta my face with that shit

            so, my takeaway from all this is that toyota is still the best way to go if you for some reason just have to buy a “infotainment” car

            • [deleted]@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Maps/navigation is the one feature that infotainment systems have that is a step up and worth a small amount of cost.

              • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                It will be instantly outdated.

                The phone you use is going to be a far better method of navigation. Cars need a dumb screen that connects to your phone and displays the map, problem solved. Although id take all screens out of cars but kids today need a screen or they freak out I guess.

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              24 hours ago

              What options are there that don’t have infotainment garbage without buying something that’s 10 years old?

              • Horsey@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                I will not buy a car without a 15” screen. I just cannot read directions as fast on any smaller screen. The bigger the information on the screen, the faster I can read it, and the less precision I need with my gaze.

        • noodles@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Sorry, I meant that they’re all too huge for European roads. Quality wise it varies considerably, Chevy group has kind of stepped it up and honda/the Koreans have slipped (though miles better than Stellantis group with Dodge and jeep still).

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Only some places in Europe have roads too small to accomodate them, but regardless, these vehicles are stupid everywhere

  • melfie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Everyone else on the road when one of these drives by with a loud muffler:

  • Aljernon@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    New f150s dwarf old f250s in size despite not being able to haul as much. I read somewhere that American farmers have a strong preference for pickups from the 90s because new trucks are worse at doing truck stuff in every way.

  • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Hey OP.

    I get some people prefer a screenshot here instead of just the youtube link, but why not put the youtube link in the body of the post?

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    The fucked-up thing is these hulking beasts are a recent construct, we used to have genuinely small trucks here once.

    A stock S10 from the '80s, '90s, or early '00s is going to be significantly smaller than a stock Colorado you can pick up new off the lot right now, for example, and that S10 would’ve been more than good enough for things like basic junk runs to the scrapyard or for hardware store runs for things like bags of sand or whatever.

    • regdog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 day ago

      It won’t because its exterior has too many sharp edges to be street legal. It will never be allowed in europe, not without a whole bunch of laws beeing changed.

        • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have a oddly hard time spotting Cybertrucks in the wild, I think it’s my brain trying to spare me the psychic damage of seeing such an ugly vehicle.

        • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Every time I see one turning or handling a slope it looks like the handling is traaaaaaash.

          I will say that the wheels and tires actually look cool. On a different vehicle those could be very stylish for a city truck someone in Ft Worth or Atlanta might have.

      • roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I suppose they could stick a bunch of goofy bumpers on it like the US compliant Countach. It might be the only way to make them uglier.

  • witty_username@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wouldn’t this be a suitable topic for a citizens initiative? Along the lines of the stop killing games movement?

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I drove a few hundred kilometers on the highway the other day after a bit of snow fall, of course the four cars that I saw in the ditch were pickups

      • mjr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        the four cars that I saw in the ditch were pickups

        High centre of gravity strikes again!

        • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I think in this case it was more the lack of winter tires and weight over the rear

          awful lot of people seem to think all-terrain tires are perfectly suited for winter

          • mjr@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Still, it’s the pathetic weight distribution/positioning. Bad design. Unsafe at any speed.

  • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Help how? I would love nothing more if I never had to see one again but I can hardly prohibit others from having one

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      you can make sure that you treat the owners like the selfish assholes they are, though

      might influence some of them, at the least it’s definitely better than nothing