TheSparrowPrince@lemmy.world to Movies and TV Shows@lemmy.filmEnglish · 1 year agoIGN | Rotten Tomatoes Under Fire After PR Firm's Scheme to Pay Critics for Positive Reviews Uncoveredwww.ign.comexternal-linkmessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up1517arrow-down18cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldmovies@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmit.onlinemovies@kbin.social
arrow-up1509arrow-down1external-linkIGN | Rotten Tomatoes Under Fire After PR Firm's Scheme to Pay Critics for Positive Reviews Uncoveredwww.ign.comTheSparrowPrince@lemmy.world to Movies and TV Shows@lemmy.filmEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square75fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldmovies@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmit.onlinemovies@kbin.social
minus-squareArghZombies@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·1 year agoWhich is why RT scores were usually good. Because a RT percentage is just the percentage of critics that thought the film was good or better. Too many people treat RT scores as a single “this is a film that has a quality rating of 90%” whereas it’s “90% of critics think it’s not shit”. Really, this is RTs fault for picking a metric so often used in a different way.
Which is why RT scores were usually good. Because a RT percentage is just the percentage of critics that thought the film was good or better.
Too many people treat RT scores as a single “this is a film that has a quality rating of 90%” whereas it’s “90% of critics think it’s not shit”.
Really, this is RTs fault for picking a metric so often used in a different way.