• 018118055@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rent seeking in classical economics is about monopolists abusing their market position. I’m sure there are some monopolistic landlords but doubt it’s the average case.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The rent of the land, therefore, considered as the price paid for the use of the land, is naturally a monopoly price. It is not at all proportioned to what the landlord may have laid out upon the improvement of the land, or to what he can afford to take; but to what the farmer can afford to give.

      I’m not sure even Adam Smith of all people agrees with you

      • 018118055@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good quote thanks. I suppose he refers to the specific plot of land being rented. Still, I’m just telling what I learned in my economics a-level.

    • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      A monopoly is not necessary, just enough influence to affect policy. The biggest landlords are some of the most abusive and manipulative, and engage in much lobbying. Their collusion is part of why housing costs so much, and the government refusing to investigate it is due to their lobbying. Literal rentseeking lol, but yes I’m aware the word isn’t usually so straightforward.

      I like this definition:

      Rentseeking is an economic concept that occurs when an entity seeks to gain added wealth without any reciprocal contribution of productivity.