Don’t click whatever this is. This user is spamming gore across multiple instances

🙄

K. You Suck.

And yes.

I am the media I consume and I will defend myself. If you tell me why you like something else instead, that is an attack against me. Also if that media changes in a way I don’t like, the creators are insidiously stealing a part of me

insulting at best.

If nothing else, I’m glad you feel insulted

No you don’t understand, Adrian Zenz has that thing that Jim Carrey had in Liar Liar where he can’t lie! That’s why we have to believe his assertions over all apparent evidence

you still dont get it

ape holders can use multiple slurp juices on a single ape

so if you have 1 ape and 3 slurp juices you can create 3 new apes

WHAT

THE FUCK

I was trying to become socially a good person for friends, to become socially favourable towards girls

Those are one and the same thing. Women aren’t some other kind of beast that you have to learn about, they’re just people that you need to unlearn some distinctions about if you ever want to connect with them. Same goes for men.

When I hear another man talk about men being chimps when chasing women, I hear excuses for stereotypical and often violent behavior

So, what did you telling this feminist about your self improvement look like? Did it involve saying anything about the supposed nature of men and/or women?

Because you’re doing that here, and “self-improvement” has become synonymous with evo-psych quackery like Jordan Peterson’s

“Simply saying I was working on self improving” lmao

You’re the one making rightwing, redpill assertions. Shut up about women and you won’t have this problem

Did your “self improving” consist of listening to pseudo-evolutionary pseudo-psychologists run their mouths?

Be in the owning class.

It’s a cheat code to a work-free life.

Go on then, dismiss me with your hexbear memes and be gone.

So pouty

Do you understand the difference between an unused housing unit and an in-use one?

So in the moral system you’re proposing, it would be an offense to use those buildings without their owner’s permission. The fact that people denied access to those buildings will die as a result, though, is just a part of nature

So, why would you expect a perspective which values property more than people to stir anyone’s moral feeling? If you don’t expect that, then why are you bothering to frame it in terms of right and wrong?

Just to compare, what’s your moral read on all the people we deny housing to, who regularly die of exposure while empty housing units outnumber them?

Pro-tankie is when I’m not allowed to imply that Westerners are good-hearted and rational, but everyone else is a bunch of animals who need us to teach them how to be human