Well duh. The first rule of owning a firearm is making sure that it isn’t the first time you use it in the moment you need to use it

Literal 1st amendment violation. Just fascist things.

Why do the concerns seem to be focused on what data was extracted rather than why there’s a massive, state sanctioned civilian surveillance network? I mean, I know the answer, but it’s extremely frustrating that people are just fine with intensive surveillance on US citizens from at least 14 countries.

There’s a difference between a political entity and the people it represents. The people of Israel have a right to exist, just as you, me, the Palestinian people, Ukrainian people, and Lebanese people have a right to exist. Political entities do not have a right to exist. The fascist Israeli government should be dismantled.

Gulf War 3: this time it’s genocide

Because it’s part of the sports-ification of politics.

Every county has a county seat. There’s nothing preventing the county seat from being a regional travel hub.

You’re extremely overestimating the relationship between China and Russia. The risk of backdoors in foreign equipment is everpesent, but also extremely unlikely for a consumer device.

Sounds to me like you might be aromatic. There’s nothing wrong with that. Personally, I’m asexual. I faced similar issues before I discovered my sexuality

This is an actual nonstory.

Delay tactics to avoid the inevitability that we need to abandon capitalism.

Don’t forget to kidnap a few employees too while you’re in the wrong store

Real question, are there any instances of someone’s research being so niche that the only option is to cite themselves?

The appropriate response when a fascist makes a good point is to tell them to fuck off, because they’re going to twist that to fit their bullshit.

Nothing. He’s banking his win on core supporters only, hoping Harris fumbles in the days leading up, and planning another coup. He’s just detailing the culture war stuff.

By the nature of ETFs, you’re definitely going to make less income because your money gets put into an investment pool and returns are proportional. However it makes you less tied to the stock market, which is increasingly tied to a person’s ability to retire

Well, both of us are socialists (I can’t comment on the other person). We think about money in such a different way that any money joke about investment is going to lose it’s humor. I don’t understand it as a joke either, but I definitely understood the financial advice. He selected some large, relatively uncontroversial companies that will pay you part of the quarterly profits based on the number of stocks you own. Tbh I’d avoid the day trading and choose high dividend ETFs instead. $100k is still very out of reach for most people, but it’s a reasonable investing portfolio.

And the dude said it to a native American whose tribe has been in the region for millennia. He’s not even a native to the state.

Right, I’m not denying that. People have always been smart. The problem that calculus solved was the intensely difficult algebra that it replaced

The joke is that calculus as a field of mathematics didn’t exist until millennia after the fall of the empire