• pips@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What’s crazy is even Instagram and WhatsApp don’t have this many permissions.

      • astrobound@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        IG and WhatsApp definitely still get all the telemetry they need - just through other methods or through OS level permission loopholes unfortunately

    • electromage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No because that would hinder their ability to dump information about everything they’re doing and who they’re with for attention.

  • 2Xtreme21@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah this is truly insane. This will never be on my phone. It also helps that Europe thinks this is bullshit as well and it’s not available here.

  • Lee Duna@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    YSK Meta is also a threat to the privacy of fediverse users, if there are fediverse instances that remain federated with Meta.

    Ross Schulman, senior fellow for decentralization at digital rights nonprofit the Electronic Frontier Foundation, notes that if Threads emerges as a massive player in the fediverse, there could be concerns about what he calls “social graph slurping." Meta will know who all of its users interact with and follow within Threads, and it will also be able to see who its users follow in the broader fediverse. And if Threads builds up anywhere near the reach of other Meta platforms, just this little slice of life would give the company a fairly expansive view of interactions beyond its borders.

    https://www.wired.com/story/meta-threads-privacy-decentralization/

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        People should use Signal instead. I don’t care if anybody doesn’t like it, it’s what I use and if you want to talk to me you’ll fuckin’ use it.

        Never installing any Facebook garbage apps.

          • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            You would only lose contact with the people who didn’t care enough to keep in touch. That’s a win-win situation.

            • DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              It’s not just people who know, knew but also new connections that could’ve gone somewhere given enough time and energy.

              Being the first to fight for privacy in my circles has amputated so many of my possibilities.

              Legislation needs to pas so I don’t have to tell everyone that I don’t want my damn picture on the internet every time someone pulls a phone out.

    • Gompje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Haha good one! I was wondering why that name sounded familiar and this is it.

      Very good film to see… once and never ever unsee or forget the images, isn’t it?

  • nighty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meta apps and shady Flashlight/Calculator apps, the two at 80mph, who wins?

  • kevincox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    app store: Please check your data security failures.

    facebook: thinks

    facebook: I’ll take the lot!

  • aquapete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I fell for the hype and down loaded to see what it was about. I didn’t read that!! What does the financial info mean? What level of detail do they have access to? Like for credit score is that info on my phone or are they getting access to a credit card app? Stealing info while I’m logged into app?