• Phat_Albert@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Around 1/3 of GDP is from state owned businesses. They definitely have a strong market economy there but my point was that capitalism causes greenhouse gas emissions like the guy I replied to stated is not true.

      • Phat_Albert@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No but state owned is the exact definition of communist. China has a communist government which allows a high degree of market/capitalist activity.

        • Captain Minnette@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          state owned is the exact definition of communist

          The anarchist communists that have existed for at least 180 years would probably disagree with you.

          • Phat_Albert@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I have no idea what an anarchist communist is but I think this conversation got way off track. A communist country’s defining feature is that the public has (ostensibly) ownership of property which is typically through the state.

            If you live on a literal commune somewhere of course the reality will be different.

            The original conversation was regarding who produces pollution, a capitalist or communist nation, with my point being that it doesn’t matter what the form of government is.

      • darkseer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The original definition of capitalism used to be an economy where 90% of businesses and property are privately owned. And while I admit that the meaning of words tend to change over time I think that the meaning of capitalism was deliberately changed so that the Soviet Union doesn’t sound as insane as it was to future generations. L

        • Captain Minnette@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Original definition according to who? Best I can tell from reading the literature, the definition in the public sphere was changed to this definition in the 20th century. Papers wrote of state capitalism in the 1880s. By the 1890s in Germany, the idea had already arisen that perhaps state socialism isn’t possible as it will always become state capitalism.

          • darkseer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s strange, but I distinctly remember three different school books giving that exact definition. Yet, when I looked up the etymology for the word it said that it started out as a disparaging French word for money lender and was picked up by the British to describe anyone who made money in enterprise.

        • animelivesmatter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think that the meaning of capitalism was deliberately changed so that the Soviet Union doesn’t sound as insane as it was to future generations.

          That’s certainly a claim. One I’ve never heard before. You should probably provide a source for that, because that sound like bullshit.

          Besides, I don’t think calling the Soviet Union “state capitalist” downplays how bad they were, especially when that’s coming from a leftist.

          • darkseer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Decided to do some research after your questions. Turns out the word was used/coined by the French as a derogatory word for money lenders was co opted by the British later as a derogatory word for anyone involved in manufacturing and other base enterprises. And then some economists in the 80s and 90s tried to redefine it and even wrote that dedinition into some Social Studies and Economy textbooks that I remember reading throughout my life in school.