cross-posted from: https://lemy.lol/post/21886458

While Judaism is excluded despite never having any conflict with them.

Why the same excuse which is used to exclude muslims and Jews is not used to exclude Christians?

Are they afraid of western retribution? What is the logic behind keeping Christianity but excluding Judaism?

There are plenty of Christian countries for Christians to go to just like muslims. So, why include Christians?

  • velox_vulnus@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Adding to the other reply because it does not mention NRC.

    NRC is the particular bill that will make Indian citizens stateless, assuming that the folks caught aren’t Indians well, life does not work that way, right? Many Indians themselves do not have the document to identify themselves as Indians. By the way, NRC has been tried and tested in Assam almost a decade ago - resulting in 19 lakh (~19,00,000) of 3.29 crore (~3,29,00,000) people ending up in immigration detention, which is a lot of people. Interestingly, most of them were Hindus.

    Now, CAA is the bill for people identified as persecuted minority to bypass that. CAA and NRC works in tandem to allow only acceptable legal-but-lost-their-document and illegals. That clearly excludes Muslims, and other refugees from Afghanistan (Hazaras Muslim), Pakistan (Ahmaddiya), Sri Lanka (Tamilians, Hindus, Christians, Muslims), Nepal (Christians), Myanmar (Rohingya Hindus and Muslims, Chin Christians) and Bhutan (Lhotshampa).