• Steve@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        After this, the FAA should require Boeing to pay spacex to maintain a crew dragon rescue ready to launch at all times the starliner is on orbit.

        • mercano@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Maybe. There are only four Crew Dragons. One’s attached to the station right now, and one’s had its docking equipment removed in preparation for the spacewalk on the Polaris Dawn mission. That leaves two. I’m sure one’s already in prep for the next regularly scheduled crew rotation. A rescue mission would mean either leaving two of the astronauts scheduled to fly that flight on the ground to leave open seats for the Starliner crew, or a special mission using the last Dragon.

            • mercano@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              Originally they had planned on two more seats in the Crew Dragon behind / below the commander and pilot, but when they switched from a powered land landing to a parachute splashdown, they had to adjust the angles of the seats & the travel in the seat suspension. Those changes required them to drop the second row of seats.

    • atocci@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      To be fair, regarding redundancy:

      The astronauts only need seven hours of “free-flight time” to perform the end-of-mission maneuvers and Starliner currently has enough helium for 70 hours of free-flight time, Boeing said.

      • SatouKazuma@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Boeing said

        Do we really trust them at this point? I mean, if true that’s great, but they’ve lied before.

        • atocci@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          From a business point of view, I don’t think lying about this is in their best interest. If they lie to the FAA about their passenger planes, maybe they get an investigation and a fine. If they lie to NASA about the safety of Starliner, they lose their only customer for it.

  • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wanted to come in here and say something about helium being so small that a small leak would be very easy to miss but 5?

    • Glimpythegoblin @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not to mention that they make helium leak detectors. I’m not an expert but I built a helium tight 60000psi system a couple weeks ago first try. Granted it didn’t have to survive a trip on a rocket.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean, to be fair, I’d like to know more about the volume lost here.

    For example people often struggle to imagine that the sun is losing 4.7 million tons every second. Or that ships constantly take on water they have to pump out. This is part of normal operation, and while the helium leaks here clearly are not, if built with a degree of redundancy in mind, certain loss rates are entirely acceptable.

    Or not.

    Depends on the volume involved. 😅

  • Doombot1@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    lol, I worked on a project at my company that sent a box with various instruments up to space sometime in February… but it’s waiting on something that’s on the Starliner before it can be unboxed and used, so now it’s just been sitting for 4 months and will continue to do so for god-knows-how-long