While Second World communism was suffering from fissures, the Third World was further united by a bit of First World bumbling. After Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal, France and Britain invaded—against Washington’s wishes—to reassert control of the waterway and oust the Egyptian leader. They were joined by the young state of Israel, whose creation had been supported by both Washington and Moscow, but eventually had to back down because of US pressure. Despite Eisenhower’s anger with the new Jewish state, Washington steadily increased support for Israel from the middle of the 1950s for Cold War reasons. It was the nascent alliances between the USSR and radical Arab nationalist regimes, we know now, that formed the basis for a growing US-Israel alliance.6

Is this true? It seems very detached from reality and no sources are given aside from a note that is kinda irrelevant to the question. Since when was the US “angry” about the foundation of Isntreal and since when was the USSR a supporter of it or even neutral to it at all? This feels like bullshit

  • chickentendrils [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    (In general don’t forget that Bevins’ book, while good and informative, is somehow still a hangout of sorts, there’s still more in Indonesia that it doesn’t touch on that’s somehow even worse. I won’t speak ill of him because I don’t know much about him, but I think the details will be coming through the left podcast sphere in due time. Don’t want to butcher it.)