• Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Just going to keep posting this every time it comes up.

    We could reduce energy and materials cost of global production worldwide to 30% current capacity by planning production instead of leaving it to the market, and greatly increase the standard of living for everyone on this planet. But first we have to get rid of capitalism and institute democratic socialist planning.

    https://open.spotify.com/episode/7n1POfYMo1I3kcy0oqSm6l?si=8ikYVJN8TIupvjoaCMRssA

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      But first we have to get rid of capitalism and institute democratic socialist planning.

      All strains of Socialism are democratic, it’s a bit redundant to include unless you’re trying to emphasize the democratic factor as opposed to our current system.

  • CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    Italiano
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Simple solution: take power, ban the right-wing parties and their financers, if they protest use acid cannons, blackmailing and censorship towards them and coup every country with a right-wing government.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s not about stopping climate change anymore. That ship has sailed and sunk.

    Now its about surviving long enough to witness very bad things happening to very bad people.

    • Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 minutes ago

      There is still time to change course, however carbon sequestration is becoming a more important part of climate action. Doomerism just acts as an excuse to not take action.

  • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Just putting it out there that “property owning” is not the class deliniator! I “own” my house/property and the only differences are that i pay rent to a bank instead of a landlord, and i can knock holes in the walls if i want to.

    I’m still pretty much paycheck to paycheck, squarely in the working class.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    20 years? Not 25? I thought 2060 was when things would really crumble due to climate change is we continued business as usual (which is what we’re doing).

    • Zombie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Does it matter? Ultimately, these are estimates. Educated, data backed estimates, but still estimates.

      One larger than expected volcanic eruption, coral reefs dying faster than expected, whatever, all it takes is one or two things to not go the way they’re expected and everything speeds up.

      20 years or 25 years, the point is we’re all kinda fucked unless we do something about it.

      What we need to do has been and will continue to be debated ad nauseam, but we know we must do something.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      Are you referring to China? Because that would be an exceptionally bad example.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        Yep, taking one of the most populous countries on the planet and judging it by total emissions is ludicrous, plus the PRC is drastically improving solar panel production and infrastructure. If the world was set to the same environmental standards as the PRC we wouldn’t have nearly as much worry.

  • Xanthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    We could be nuked today

    I agree, we should focus more on climate change, though.