EDIT: See @AnimePhantasm comment below! My friend called the election board and they confirmed what @AnimePhantasm and @fmstrat commented! This was Virginia reusing last year’s envelopes.

OP I am an absentee voter in Blacksburg just next door. Shine a light on the blacked out part. I am 99% sure this is legit, they just crossed out the witness requirement. I can see the word witness under the sharpie in your picture. Virgina doesnt have to do that witness thing anymore. We did at the last general election, so I am guessing they just reused the same envelopes. You should call and ask your elections office before alerting the news. They are hardworking folks whose jobs are already 100 times harder then they used to be. Stirring up reports of election fraud where it isn’t happening makes us just as bad as them.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    382
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is a felony, and can likely be traced back to the election helper who did it.
    Report it!

  • PoopingCough@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    200
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    A lot of the virginia ballots were mailed out with the return envelopes already sealed up. I called the election office and they said to cut them open and just seal them back with tape 🤣

    Edit: to all the folks concerned about my vote, thank you for your concern. I’m not too worried about it for several reasons. You can check online to see when your ballot is received and accepted, so I’ll be doing that. If it isn’t accepted in the next week or so I’ll definitely be making some calls. Worse comes to worse, I can always go to my polling place on the day and get a provisional ballot in case something happens to my mail-in. I live in a pretty blue area so I have some trust in the local offices here; they’ve given no reason for me to be suspicious. Nonetheless I’ll still be double checking.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      123
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      This can happen if the envelopes get damp, but they should send you a replacement. Otherwise, someone could swap out your ballot and then just tape it closed.

      • PoopingCough@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        73
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Which is exactly why I called my local election office, and I even mentioned it might have been because of the rain we were having, but I was told no, it wasnt the damp that caused it because they had confirmed with the factory that sent the ballots out that some had been sent out like that. They then told me to tape it and when I was hesitant because I had the same thought as you they told me they had checked several times with the registrar that taping them up was what to do. They said it was a known issue so it would be accepted.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            This and the original Op image are why I refuse to do absentee/mail in voting.

            Theres just so many ways it can be fucked with, and potentially handwaved away. Especially at an institutional level in the less reputable coughconservativecough states.

            Mail in ballot used to be fine, and safe, and secure… but 8 years of fucking domestic political terrorism/usurpation/insurrection/etc have kicked that out the door, down the stairs, into the street and infront of the bus.

            I don’t care what I have to do, what sacrifices I have to make, and what I have to endure.

            I’m voting in person this election, cause its too important not to.

            and everyone else should too.

            Cause in person voting is the only way to minimize the fuckery they can pull.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              26
              ·
              3 months ago

              Another way is to discourage people from early voting and then lose some percentage who end up not voting on election day either.

              You’re not wrong. I’ll be voting in person for this reason. But if you’re not 100% sure you’ll make it on election day, vote early. Preferably do it in person.

              Some votes will likely count more than others.

              • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Yep. Increase the need for in-person voting, decrease the amount of voting locations, have armed republican “volunteers” patrolling places, and then see how many people are willing to wait hours with armed right-wing militants eyeballing whether your glasses make you a “libtard.”

                I have no statistical evidence to back this up, but my gut feeling is that the aggregate of all the voting fuckery, election board fuckery, voting laws fuckery might end up be worth as much as 3-5% in battleground states. There’s no statistical model that accounts for the illegal/quasi-legal voter suppression and disenfranchisement efforts.

                All polls assume that everyone that can vote and intends to vote will get to vote and that their vote will be counted and that the counted votes will be accurately reported. That’s a serious blind spot in election polling. And since the Republicans have been screaming that elections are fraudulent because of democratic/immigrant fantasies for four full years, when legitimate fraud can and does occur, no Democrat will be able to say it loud enough that it matters.

            • CM400@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              3 months ago

              I mean sure, I pretty much agree with you, but…

              There were so many fucking trumpers hanging out at the parking lot of my voting site last time, I don’t want to be (or for my family to) around that shit.

              • medgremlin@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                3 months ago

                A lot of states have places for early in-person voting. You might have to drive a bit of a distance, but it allows for in-person voting in a less chaotic environment.

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You might have to drive a bit of a distance, but it allows for in-person voting in a less chaotic environment.

                  And thus we see how voter intimidation at polling places on election day is still effective even with early voting, since it skews towards people with cars/the means to get to the early-voting locations.

              • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                IT was like that in 2016 for me.

                I shouldered my way through anyway. They are stupid, but they aint complete fucking morons. They know starting shit at an election venue is a good ticket to federal pound-them-in-the-ass prison.

            • Match!!@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              nah my state rules and doesn’t have this shit going on. remember to check that your ballot is received and recorded after you vote either way

            • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Even during Covid I felt a similar way. My “compromise” has been in person early voting. It’s pretty much always dead when I go in and is very quick. I don’t think I have actually voted on election day in over a decade.

        • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 months ago

          …what…

          How can an election office accept envelopes that have been tampered with? Call them back and record the answer, then call local news, blast them on every social media you have, put a crazy persons handwritten sign in your window about it, whatever it takes. The person who said they would accept envelopes that had been cut and taped just admitted they will accept votes that may have been tampered with…

          • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            If the election results aren’t to their liking, these will be easy votes to start kicking out. And then the votes that are doubled through provisional voting, i.e., voting in person as well as mail-in in order to be sure your vote was counted.

            It won’t matter if they’re counted correctly in the end. The point will be to immediately kill off democratic votes, create as much chaos as possible, declare victory, and when the dust settles, the republican, right-wing national network of fast-response staff, politicians, lawyers, and friendly judges that they’ve been preparing for four years while democrats did basically nothing will have effectively taken the election by force. SCOTUS already made a decision that will allow them to effectively decide this election. So the right-wing ideologues already have local, regional, state, and national plans that extend all the way to the highest court in the land.

            And the Democrats have “but that’s not fair.”

    • gsfraley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      3 months ago

      Same thing happened to me in Pennsylvania. Will be watching very carefully on the ballot status emails to make sure it’s still accepted.

      • scaramobo@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 months ago

        The question of course being: what will you do or can you do if it’s not accepted? How far will someone go to make their vote count? Many people would likely not bother with it, which could make this a quite succesful way of sabotaging.

        • jeffw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          You usually have to go to a county office in PA. They may try to contact you if it’s early enough

      • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        May want to read my other comment, what was crossed out could be normal do to process changes and not reprinting envelopes.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d call your local TV station or newspaper. Let them investigate and publicize it, and if it’s all aboveboard at least it’ll be out in the open.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      And the Republicans will scream about how democrats are using provisional ballots to vote twice. They’ll try to cast doubt on any non-favorable election result, and they’ll have the provisional votes as proof. The fact that it doesn’t mean the vote was counted twice will get lost in the noise, and it’ll be one more BS piece of “evidence” to cast the election as illegitimate.

      I’m not saying you’re doing anything wrong, I think you’re doing the right thing. But we’re just in a very fucked up place politically right now.

  • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s almost as if Republicans can’t win the popular vote and have to cheat or something (:

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Just to be real, they really don’t care about the popular vote. They care about the electoral vote. And even that isn’t totally true. They care about the electoral victory. They long ago abandoned democracy; they don’t care about having democratically granted power. They just want the power.

      A little felony by blacking out a mail-in ballot is literally the least they’re ready, willing, and able to do to win.

      I continue to be incredibly frustrated by how little democrats have done to counter the fraud, voter suppression, constitutionally dubious laws, takeover of state election boards and volunteers, and armed, volunteer “ballot watchers” the Republicans have deployed.

      The republican “ground game” that extends beyond simply GOTV efforts and campaigning and into the wide-ranging and widespread strategies and tactics to literally dismantle and inhibit the democratic process has been met with very little resistance by the democrats. Somehow they’re going to be blindsided by this, cry foul retroactively, and then be hamstrung trying to play defense from behind. Wilfully ignorant, short-sighted, and incredibly dangerous idiocy for something so fundamentally important.

      The democrats don’t have to be unethical because the Republicans are, but they should have been being proactive and serious about countering these attacks on the democratic process. Instead the approach seems to be sticking their fingers firmly in their ears and going “lalalalala.”

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        and armed, volunteer “ballot watchers”

        I’ll be there on election day. Take that as you will.

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          That just works against your own interests. The point is people patrolling around glaring at people is voter intimidation. You think people will recognize “oh, that guy is on our side”?

          Even if that was the case, do you think knowing there are TWO armed groups that hate each other prowling around a voting location is less intimidating?

          We get it, you have a gun. You’re not helping.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            To be fair, if they’re Black, or have rainbow hair, and are glaring at the old white dudes wearing red, it would make me feel safer.

        • noisefree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          and armed, volunteer “ballot watchers” I’ll be there on election day. Take that as you will.

          Oh shit everybody, @shalafi@lemmy.world is gonna be there! We can all collectively sigh in relief now!

    • microphone900@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      There’s a neat post I came across some time ago showing how few votes can still win the electoral college.

      Comment link

      Direct link to website

      Turns out, though unlikely, it is possible to win the election with less than 25% of votes through the magic of the electoral college and disproportionate representation.

  • AnimePhantasm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    3 months ago

    OP I am an absentee voter in Blacksburg just next door. Shine a light on the blacked out part. I am 99% sure this is legit, they just crossed out the witness requirement. I can see the word witness under the sharpie in your picture. Virgina doesnt have to do that witness thing anymore. We did at the last general election, so I am guessing they just reused the same envelopes. You should call and ask your elections office before alerting the news. They are hardworking folks whose jobs are already 100 times harder then they used to be. Stirring up reports of election fraud where it isn’t happening makes us just as bad as them.

    • UnpopularCrow@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      Excellent point. I alerted my friend to your post. I don’t have the envelope, they just sent me the picture. They go to bed early but I’ll update you in the morning.

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      3 months ago

      For mail-ins, yeah, you sign it to do the final “I authorize this document to be my vote”.

      If you don’t authorize it, it’s not legally your vote.

    • krelvar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 months ago

      For mail in balloting at least in my state you sign the return envelope NOT the ballot itself.

      • femtech@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        In Illinois they give you two, well 3 technically. The one everything comes in, the one you put the ballot in, and the one you put the ballot envelope in. So the signature is not on the outside or on the ballot itself.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve always had to sign my vote by mail ballot envelope in CA. They keep a signature on file from when you last registered to absentee (not vote at your polling place) vote and compare the two to see if someone else is trying to vote in your name.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      something you have to remember about the US is that while it’s a democracy, all the democratic practices were started in the 1800s, often with explicit intention to negate the votes of some discriminated group

      • modifier@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 months ago

        And one party is doing their best to keep that heritage of disenfranchisement alive.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You sign the envelope that contains the ballot. That way, an election worker can compare the signature on the envelope to your signature on file.

      This is how they make sure that someone didn’t steal the ballot from your mailbox and fill it out for you.

      Once the signature is verified, the envelope is opened and the anonymous ballot inside is removed and stored with all the others. When they are counted, there will be no way to tell who filled out each ballot.

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        When I did absentee voting, the voter signature and voter id information were on a perforated slip attached to the outside of the envelope.

        That way, the process is something like:

        1. Look at the slip. Verify voter signature, eligibility to vote, and mark as having voted in the voter rolls.
        2. Detach perforated slip from sealed envelope. Sealed envelope now contains no identifying information. (This envelope was mailed inside an outer mailing envelope.)
        3. Entire sealed envelope and contents thereof goes into big bin of accepted ballots.
        4. Later, election workers open the sealed envelopes from the bin and run the actual ballot papers through the scantron machine.
      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        And yet the “scary machines” are too easy to tamper with… they are scared of them because of how hard it would be to get away with tampering with them. And they know their supporters and others in government don’t know any better and will jump on the bandwagon of the machines being vaguely scary.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          As I understand it, a fairly bulletproof method is to vote using a machine that prints out a human readable card with a punch through the candidates you voted for. So you can confirm the machine understood the options you tapped and then drop the paper ballot into a secure box, which can be used as a backup for manual recounts.

          Anybody know if this is what the experts [still] want?

          • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Honestly, while it would certainly help sell it to less technical people. There is no need for a paper copy to make it impossible to get away with tampering with digital voting, building in safeguards entirely digitally is actually enough.

            But yes, most commonly recommended option is to have the machines do a quick result, and then paper to verify.

    • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yep, we have the same system in the UK. In fact, the envelope looks almost exactly the same so they might even be printed by the same company.

      You get two envelopes (one big, one small), a postal voting statement, and a ballot paper.

      The actual ballot paper just has a list of options for you to put your X against; there’s no personally identifiable information on it. Once you’ve filled it out you seal it in the small envelope.

      You then fill in the voting statement (it has your name and address on it so they can cross your name off as voted, and you sign it so they can check your signature matches the one on file) and both that and the sealed ballot go in the big envelope. That way your vote is still private because they check the vote is valid in one step and then add your ballot to a pile to be counted with the others in a second step, at which point it’s anonymous.

      https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/voting-and-elections/ways-vote/how-vote-post

    • lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      The key point is that if it’s not signed, it gives them an excuse to throw it away.

      Do that to enough people and you end up with a big problem. The uncounted votes could swing the election, or you get a messy court case where some judges step in and basically decide the election on their own, or who knows what else.

      At a minimum, it’s sets the stage for chaos. And from the chaos can emerge a chaotic outcome.

    • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      just imagine gremlins running around in your election system at every level. thats pretty much whats happening

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I could be mistaken, but most places check your signature against the voter roll. If your signature doesn’t match, then they’ll ask for an ID. At least that’s how it was where I volunteered in 2020. This is done before you get your ballot. You don’t actually sign the ballot itself.

  • Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly that is scary to see. People are going to lose the chance to influence. A true potential for a stolen election.

  • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This brought up a concern of mine that I had last year. I tried looking but couldn’t find it. Is there a way to verify that my vote was counted and specifically counted for whom I voted?

    Edit: To clarify, my state does have voter history but only what elections I vote in, not how I voted.

    Worst case scenario, someone intercepts my ballot and/or changes my vote. Website says “yep, you voted.” Great, but I want to know it was counted correctly.

    Ultimately our whole voting system needs an overhaul, but I doubt that’ll happen anytime soon.

    • otterpop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t believe there is, and if there was, it could be used for some really nefarious purposes!

      • HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        3 months ago

        in my state (OR) you can sign up for an email that says when your ballot was counted but not who you voted for.

        • leds@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah there is a good reason for that to be secret: it prevents buying votes because you can’t prove who you votes for, if someone offers you money to vote a certain way you can always take the money and vote the other way, no way to prove how you voted.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        TBH idgaf who knows my vote history, I want the peace of mind that it was counted correctly.

        • boydster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I totally hear that, but at the same time it’s really important for a functioning democracy that the vote be secret. For one, it empowers a suppressed class to vote against their suppressor’s interests without fear of retaliation.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            There is already a record of who voted for what, all of your fears could be taking place as things are now. Making it accessible to the person, even with hoops to jump through, would only be an improvement.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              No, there’s not. There’s a record of who voted. There is a record of your political party in most states. There is no record of who you actually voted for.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                The majority of votes in the USA are electronically counted, and a ballot itself is a record of a vote as well. What there isn’t is a searchable index of who voted for what, and I apologize for my unclear language.

                But the likelihood of oppression based on availability of those vote records is still very much there even if the voter themself doesn’t have access.

                • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Back to school. Vote-buying breaks democracy. Not having proof of who you voted for makes vote-buying pointless. Yes, your vote could be miscounted. This is generally less of a problem than the general population being able to sell their votes and can be mitigated in a variety of ways which don’t tie votes to voters.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Now THAT is some privilege lol

          Plenty of places in the US where you risk personal danger if people know how you voted.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Then those individuals shouldn’t share how they voted, but I want the freedom to see how my vote was counted.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            And they have the right to conceal their vote, as they should, but why should I not have the right to reveal mine even to myself, Necromancer?

            • boydster@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              That’s not how this started, moving the goalposts is pretty cheap. I was literally linking to an issue happening in this vary election that illustrates why secret ballots are so important. A position which, if you recall, you began by stating was invalid because you misunderstand (or, now more clearly, willfully misrepresent) how democracy in the US works, and your proposed “solution” only helps illustrate the easy ways vote buying and manipulation would be introduced without secret ballots. I’ll block you, for obvious reasons. Good luck

              There is already a record of who voted for what, all of your fears could be taking place as things are now. Making it accessible to the person, even with hoops to jump through, would only be an improvement.

              Edit: additional context for added relevance

    • just2look@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t know if all states have it, but Virginia does have vote history on their voter registration page. It doesn’t show what your vote was, but does show that it was received and counted.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you mailed in a ballot then there should be a way to confirm it was received, but there should NOT be a way to see who you voted for. Just like they can confirm that you voted in person, but again can not tell who you voted for when you showed up to vote.

      Typically when you vote by mail you receive a ballot plus two envelopes. You fill out the ballot and put it in the inner envelope that should contain no markings as to whose ballot it belongs to. This is put inside the second envelope that should have your contact information (my state uses a barcode for this) and that you have to sign.

      When the city/town clerk receives the ballot they look up your voter registration & confirm the signature on file matches the signature on the envelope. They then check off in their records that you voted by mail on that day. They take the inner envelope out of the outer envelope and add it to the other pile of envelopes they’ve received. At some later point they open those envelopes and count the ballots, but have no way of associating a given ballot back with the person who mailed it in.

      If you then try to go vote in person on Election Day (or somebody tries to impersonate you) then their records will show you already voted and you won’t be allowed to vote again.

    • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      My county in Florida allows you to show your vote was counted. Damned if I don’t check every single time.

    • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      My county in Washington state has a website where you can check the status. I even get text or email notifications for the status. “We received your ballot”, “the signature was verified”, “your vote has been counted”.

      There was even a problem with my signature once and all I had to do was log in and verify it and it was counted.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 months ago

    So somebody reported this to the State election board and told all the news agencies, right?

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 months ago

    So this is what a modern day “hanging chad” looks like. They’re really drawing on every previous election to insure there can be fraud claims.

    America is going to have a rough one, no outcome will see legitimate - which is great for Putin regardless of whether he’s involved or not.

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 months ago

    Could be old instructions for witness signatures vs anything malicious. Be sure this is a real issue first. Last time they sent out conflicting instructions which was worse. But yes, report it to be safe.

    From: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/virginia-absentee-ballot-instructions-confusing/2020/09/23/4ec4dfa8-fd1b-11ea-9ceb-061d646d9c67_story.html

    Joan Porte, vice president of the Virginia League of Women Voters and an Arlington resident, said she was furious when she saw the error on the envelope, which could have been solved, she said, by crossing it out with a marker.

    More info: https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/virginia-legislature-passes-bill-to-remove-witness-requirements-for-mail-in-voting/

  • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 months ago

    You might see if you can get this to the Meidas Touch guys too. They could help research and amplify this to the national media

    • odelik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Ughhhhhhhhh. Sorry, but I need to rant.

      Those fuckers are so fucking sensationalist. They use the same simple-mined tactics as right-wing propaganda mills. A 20 minute video of theirs could be condensed into 5 without those tactics and actually do far more to push forward their “law based coverage”.

      I quickly put them in the “not worth the sensationalist propaganda” bucket after watching a handful of their videos

      • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        They all are like that. They all use heavy clickbait titles to get attention to their videos, and those titles have a tenuous at best relationship with the actual topic, which they all blow way out of proportion and act as if this will finally be the thing that brings down Trump. These are the ones who the right refer to as having “Trum Derangement Syndrome”, as they post daily videos that are almost exclusively about Trump, while peddling products that you can tell they’ve never used or even heard of in their lives by the way they read the script.

        Don’t get me wrong. The information they give is at least truthful (exaggerated, but truthful) and the products they’re shilling are actual products and not crypto scams or something, which puts them far ahead of Trump’s supporters. But they’re still basically grifting and trying to ride the Trump train as long and as hard as they can, as I don’t know what half of them are going to do once Trump is actually out of the public eye.