Summary

The U.S. House of Representatives, led by Republicans, passed the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act” in a 218-206 vote.

The bill redefines Title IX protections, banning transgender women and girls from competing in school sports that align with their gender identity in federally funded schools.

Critics, including 400+ civil rights groups, argue it could violate students’ privacy and lacks enforcement clarity.

The bill faces slim chances in the Senate.

Broader political conflicts over disaster relief funding are complicating its path forward.

  • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I am sure this will be a nuanced and well written bill, only attacking MtF girls and women. I am sure that it won’t affect intersex people that might be facing similar challenges through no “fault” of their own. In addition, I am sure it will have a provision to protect Title IX and keep women’s sports healthy in our public schools since they care about it so much. /s Fucking idiots with no idea.

  • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’ve seen a lot of my fellow trans folk say the Democrats were going to support this. That Democrats are going to throw us under the bus and let our rights be taken away, supporting it even. Yet here we are with an actual vote on the direct subject of Trans folks’ existence and whether we can participate in sports and only 2 Dems voted for it. 1 voted present. The vast majority of the Democratic party supports trans rights and will vote against shit like this.

    When it comes to the military budget last year, which had the transphobic rider, a budget was on the line, they voted for the budget because of how important that was, regardless of how that was incredibly misguided.

    Democrats still vastly support trans people.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Nah, impossible, I was told bLuEmAGa was just as bad as real MAGA and we needed to teach em a lesson!

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      It’s also worth noting that dem house leadership spoke against it explicitly too. For instance, Hakeem Jefferies, the Dem House Minority Leader, wrote against it before the vote too

      The House Republican Child Predator Empowerment Act does not promote fairness and safety in sports.

      It will unleash horrific child predators on girls and young women throughout America.

      Unacceptable.

      https://bsky.app/profile/hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social/post/3lfpl3s35v22s

      The Dem House Whip, Whip Clark, made similar remarks on the house floor


      While I am here, I will say to make sure to contact your senators on HR 28, regardless of party, so they know how strongly people feel about it and ensure it doesn’t get past the senate filibuster. It can make more of a difference than you might think

      https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      When it comes to the military budget last year, which had the transphobic rider, a budget was on the line, they voted for the budget because of how important that was, regardless of how that was incredibly misguided.

      We’re just seeing how Democrats vote when they can’t possibly block a bill, versus how they vote when they can pass something.

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      They probably just assume that transmen will always lose to “real men” and won’t be a “problem”.

      It will be fun to watch the conservatives rant and rage when that assumption is disproven, except that it will lead to more bad laws.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, I think you are right. Would have to be a trans man that isn’t (currently?) on it, and I have no idea what the rates are for that kind of thing.

    • MrVilliam@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’m sure they’re just confused. They thought their constituents were frustrated by the rise in long-dormant “eggs” hatching into their true trans selves, but really they were bitching about the literal rise in literal cost of literal chicken eggs in literal grocery stores. Understandable mistake to assume a metaphor there. /s

  • MrVilliam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Now how exactly do you suppose this gets enforced? Because I’m betting it involves some creep being the authorized inspector of children’s genitals. I’m sure nobody will be wielding that sort of role to sexually assault any children. Yep, this is just the perfect kind of policy to enact to protect the children from… checks notes… a “boy” unfairly beating “real girls” at girls’ sports.

    Remember this moment when swaths of stories about sexually abused children come out. I’m sure those stories will come out within a couple years of a bunch of stories about how girls’ sports are suddenly seeing record low participation numbers “for some reason”.

    The horrifying statistics on the percentage of women who have been the victim of rape or attempted rape in their lifetime will be going up significantly as a direct result of this kind of legislation. Even if there were any real justification for actively discriminating against trans people, how could anybody ever be on board with this kind of direct consequence? What a disgrace.

    • fnrir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Then they’ll just say it’s the liberals fault for not keeping women subservient. Somehow it will alway be the liberal/left/woke/[enemy of the day here]'s fault.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The bill faces slim chances in the Democrat-controlled Senate.

    That bit is not correct, the new Senate has taken over and Republicans control the Senate now. However, it is subject to the filibuster so will need Democratic support to pass regardless.

    • MrVilliam@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I wonder if this bill is important enough to Senate Republicans to be the catalyst for rewriting filibuster rules. I’m sure they’ll have no problem doing away with the filibuster the moment it becomes inconvenient to their power grabs, and that would be their right as the majority party, but it’s the hypocrisy that pisses me off. Just like when they blocked a SCOTUS nomination in an election year, but had zero hesitation to ram their own SCOTUS nomination through a month before the election four years later.