I dont agree with many things apple does at all, and I also think their password manager has flaws like revealing usernames without authentification.

It is pretty handy though, to have a file where the entries are stored unencrypted, and if the password manager detects an entry it prompts to decrypt exactly that field, maybe with a fingerprint.

KeepassDX needs to run in the background and be completely unlocked to even detect apps or password fields.

Do you know any existing app that can do this?

    • FoxBJK@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      You can also run Bitwarden proper locally but unless you really know how to run and maintain a web server I wouldn’t recommend this.

      • qaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The official docker image uses a lot more resources than the vaultwarden container, but it allows significantly more than 100 users. If it’s just for yourself and your family I suggest just going with Vaultwarden.

          • qaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You don’t. I meant to say that only large organizations need the official Bitwarden docker setup, but I did not communicate that clearly enough.

        • Rootiest@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think what they meant is that one option uses network connectivity while the other functions entirely offline

        • Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Which would make it hardly accessible outside of your home. Still not locally saved as well. And imho if he is not sure which password manager he should choose, he should maybe not self host just yet.

          • Ekpu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Bitwarden keeps a local encrypted copy of the database and only connects to the server for synchronisation.

              • Oisteink@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Maybe because it seems you claim self-hosting bit warden is cloud only and that self-hosted is not accessible outside the house?
                Note: I do not recommending self-hosting bitwarden

                • Vexz@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Note: I do not recommending self-hosting bitwarden

                  Why not? I have my own instance running on my NAS and I love to have it self-hosted because this way I keep the passwords where I know nobody else can get them.

                  • Oisteink@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Because a password manager is critical and if you ask me I’d say no. If you have the know how and understand the risk you won’t be asking