• Michal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    As opposed to under capitalism where you have to cross your fingers and hoping that one of those winners will offer you a job with living wage, while another doesn’t charge you an arm and leg for housing.

    • AchillesUltimate
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      If none of the winners offer you a job, make your own, or acquire some marketable skill. You have options and opportunities.

      There aren’t as many options for housing as I’d like honestly. I’d prefer less regulation to allow for lower quality, cheaper housing. As it stands though, you still have options and the ability to improve your living conditions.

      • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ableism at it’s best. I bet you‘re gonna ask for compensation if you ever get disabled for some reason.

      • Michal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Smart people will do fine either way. I thought you were showing concern for the other people.

        • AchillesUltimate
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think everything I said applies to stupid people as well.

          There’ll always be people who need to rely on charity, but if even a guy in a wheelchair can make a good living and has more opportunities than he can count I’d say that’s a really good sign.