1984 screen of guy shouting at crowd of people.

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah I personally never really could get behind the sentiment of “oh the alt right are trying to claim Pepe? Let’s just let them have it I guess”.

    • misk@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Pepe is a commonly used far right dog whistle. Attacking this rule by associating it with zionist far right seems malicious. You sure you’re on the right side of this mate?

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Pepe was designated by the zionist ADL as a hate speech symbol. Thats literally all the reason why some people see it as a “far right dog whistle” because it was dragged through the mud by the media. Dont be fooled so easily. Dont let them take your memes.

        • misk@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          4 days ago

          ADL thrives in a politically polarised landscape where their interests intersect traditional conservatism/liberalism axis. If Pepe is divisive because of an international conspiracy then that’s a done deal already anyway - in this polarised society fascists took it as their heraldic emblem just to spite the libs. If someone decides to self-label with Pepe in today’s world then feigning ignorance isn’t a very convincing excuse to me anymore.

  • Iced Raktajino@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Weird instance rule, but they pay the bills, so whatever?

    I never bought into the whole dogwhistle story about it, but I have found that I just don’t mesh well with people who use that meme a lot, so it’s kind of a litmus test when I see someone use it.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Same. My instance has a “no ai” rule which I think is a bit harsh but I still respect.

      Most people I know who use pepe are pretty liberal

    • freamon@preferred.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think it’s mostly come up as an issue because it’s meant that piefed.social doesn’t federate with lemy.lol (because it uses a Pepe image as its icon), but https://lemmy-federate.com/ uses lemy.lol for back-end operations, so people haven’t been able to add communities on piefed.social to it.

      • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        I feel as though Lemmy federate ought to be able to use multiple instances for its back-end operations. Relying on a single instance is somewhat at odds with the spirit of decentralization.

        @iso@lemy.lol Thoughts?

        • isoA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Actually, Lemmy Federate is not tied to lemy.lol since this update: https://lemy.lol/post/46419115

          Piefed.social should decide if they want to add their instance to the Lemmy Federate. I’m not blocking anyone. In fact, there are already two Piefed instances registered to Lemmy Federate. But these instances are using generic ActivityPub client instead of specialized clients unlike Lemmy and Mbin instances.

          I’m not against Piefed but I’m not gonna work for a Piefed specific code either for reasons you can imagine.

          /cc @freamon@preferred.social