TʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agoDo you think he'll respond?imagemessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up1464arrow-down112
arrow-up1452arrow-down1imageDo you think he'll respond?TʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square48linkfedilink
minus-squareKazuchijouNolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 days agoI’d move the word “hypotetically” a bit further, so that it says: “How dare you terrorize hypotetically inocent fascists!” There, now it’s better and more accurate. Fuck them fascists. Not a single one is innocent
minus-squarezqps@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoExactly, none of them are innocent, so that part is just plain irony. “hypothetically terrorize” makes sense because simply identifying as anti-fascist can get you on terror watch lists these days.
I’d move the word “hypotetically” a bit further, so that it says:
“How dare you terrorize hypotetically inocent fascists!”
There, now it’s better and more accurate. Fuck them fascists. Not a single one is innocent
Exactly, none of them are innocent, so that part is just plain irony. “hypothetically terrorize” makes sense because simply identifying as anti-fascist can get you on terror watch lists these days.