I am filing a class action suit on behalf of over 206 individuals against the moderator of /c/modabuse @notwesker@lemmy.sdf.org for inconsistently enforcing rule 1 (no victim blaming).

EXHIBIT A: Moderator log showing instances where people received punishment for violating rule 1.

EXHIBIT B: In which @pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org quite explicitly violates rule 1 the first time.

EXHIBIT C: In which @notwesker@lemmy.sdf.org merely warns @pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org instead of applying a ban as done previously for far less explicit cases of a rule 1 violation.

EXHIBIT D: In which @pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org threatens to repeat the act of violating rule 1.

EXHIBIT E: In which @pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org explicitly violates rule 1 a SECOND time.

EXHIBIT F: In which @pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org explicitly violates rule 1 a THIRD time.

As restitution for the damages we are seeking:

  • That @pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org receive the appropriate punishment for 3 counts of violating rule 1.
  • That @notwesker@lemmy.sdf.org issue a formal written apology to the community for inconsistently enforcing the rules.
  • That all acts of restitution requested by class action claimants be satisfied to the best of @notwesker@lemmy.sdf.org’s ability.

If you would like to register as a claimant on this class action suit, please leave a subcomment here indicating such and what you request as your restitution.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    I don’t know who that pieguy is, but I’m signing up in the off chance I can get either a hand job, or a slice of lemon meringue out of this. Not too concerned with who gives the hand job, though I do request it be given with lemon meringue pie.

    • remotelove@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      You are supposed to eat the pie, not have someone rub it all over your bits, but you do you, friend. Far be it from me to kink-shame.