• gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    willing to bet the driver of the tiny truck has a bigger… ahem

      • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        And potentially family. It’s a 4 door truck. It’s a transportation vehicle with a bed and slightly greater towing capacity than a sedan. Lot of suburban dads have these.

          • Bruce_Wayne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m a tiny-truck-lover, and want one badly, but my family’s big 'murica truck is waaaay more comfortable than my current sedan :( Unrelated, but do tiny work trucks come with Bluetooth now?

            • SeducingCamel@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Damn I hated riding in the back of my dad’s Silverado. I’m almost 6ft and I can comfortably fit behind myself in the back seat of my impreza. The new Maverick looks like a pretty cool small truck option

          • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Eh, your cheaper compact sedans are comparable. It’s definitely not great, but good enough. The front seats are comfortable, at least.

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Smol one can tow stupid ugly one. What do you need to tow, that is heavier that stupid ugly one?

      • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In this case it’s not about body shaming but about shaming a means of compensation. Also it’s not really a literal take. “Big dick energy” has nothing do with actual dick size. And being a “Karen” has nothing to with a persons actual name or gender.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Neither is trashing the climate with pointlessly big vehicles just to compensate for whatever insecurities they have. We need to either tax or regulate these stupid vehicles back to a reasonable and safe size.

      • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        But the body on right is so much bigger, and takes up so much wasted space!

        The smaller body on the left is more fuel efficient too.

        Plus, body shaming when you’re ugly and useless like that is okay.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not sure if you’re serious but i will answer as if you were.

          A common attack against people with large trucks is that they have a large truck to compensate having a small penis. This implies having a small penis is bad/unacceptable. This is obvious body shaming but also contributes to toxic masculinity.
          Both of these are unacceptable.

          There are many alternative ways to talk shit without playing into these kinds of comments and TBH, the compensation comments have been used so much and are so obviously baseless that they don’t hit very hard, IMO.

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            well, i didn’t actually say that, and i’m not responsible for others filling in the blanks with their own negative thoughts. as you can see, several others actually managed to conclude something different.

            don’t blame the Rorschach test because you see something you don’t like.

              • gregorum@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                that’s exactly what blaming me for something i didn’t say is

                • mriormro@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It was implicit. If you can’t deal with being called out on your rhetoric, perhaps you shouldn’t use it.

                  Body shaming is dumb and so is owning such a huge truck.

                  • gregorum@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    you’re projecting your own insecurities onto me and making yourself angry over something you imagined. I a not to blame for things your imagination does.

                    work out your problems with a professional, not by attacking random internet strangers.

            • Mac@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Blocked. User has nothing useful to contribute and will argue in bad faith when called out.

    • seathru@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Death wish? I love kei trucks but I fear getting into a mash up in one of them.

      • catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Better to get the one that’s specifically designed to kill toddlers then. If children have to die so you can be less scared of a “mash up” then it’s all worth it.

        • seathru@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          specifically designed to kill toddlers

          “Lead designer to ensure child lethality” is such a badass job title.

      • Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        American 🫵😐

        Typical “Everyone drives a big truck so I will too!” mindset that misses the core issue on why kei trucks are the better ones. You simply can’t imagine a world where the Ford Death Cruiser 4 billion doesn’t exist.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Japan, the country that invented kei cars, also has larger cars. You’re not looking at the same chance as running into a hummer, but crashing a kei car into a white plate out here still doesn’t look good for the kei.

          In kei trucks and other models where the engine is behind you, a crash is gonna fuck you up, no matter what country you’re in or what you hit.

            • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, but they’re not banned from highways. It’s not uncommon to see them, although you’re right about lower speed limits-- a lot of highways are about 80 km max

        • seathru@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          2 wheels for me please.

          But, thank you for taking the time on that well thought out, informative post.