• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    152
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Plaintiff are seeking up to $43m in damages in defamation case and Giuliani’s lawyer tells court it would ‘be the end’ of him if he loses

    So the lawyer is saying the justice system is working as intended?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        73
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Me too, and I love the “if you punish my client, it will be bad for him” argument. That’s clearly the sign of a good lawyer.

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s the best argument he’s got, and can you blame him? There isn’t a lawyer alive who could win this for old ink scalp. His only hope is a stacked court.

        • bestnerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          This should be taught in law school in Trial Law 101: best defense

          “Your honor, this verdict is horrible for my client. Move for a mistrial.”

          “Ah good point, didn’t think of that. Wouldn’t want to inconvience this man. Granted”

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    The dildo of consequences is approaching rapidly, and he’s fresh out of lube.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      gotta be careful. even a back-pat can kill him, you know.

      (also… be extra mindful of safe sex. fucking this guy is how you catch all the STDs… and some new and interesting ones.)

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Watch ‘The Life of Brian.’ If people can find something to laugh at in a crucifixion then anything is funny.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m all for “rape is not funny” when it’s about someone’s lived experience or the like. But I don’t get this self-neutering of our sense of humor when it’s clearly not real, nor a threat, etc. Lighten up, not everything needs to be defended all the time, it’s ridiculous.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Good time for Giuliani to find those bootstraps to pull himself up. Maybe cut back on the avocado toast and Netflix. If he has a phone on him, means he’s won’t be poor and bankrupt, just lazy.

  • Hyperreality@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Former Time Person of the Year, America’s Mayor, and someone who once stood a realistic chance of becoming president.

    What a fall from grace.

    If only he’d retired at 65.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    A jury decision awarding tens of millions of dollars in damages for defamation would be a “death penalty” for Rudy Giuliani, his lawyer said during opening statements in a trial that got underway Monday.

    Hand me the soap, I need to cry a few tears for him.

    Well, if it ruins him, it works as intended. He put them through hell and back with his lies, now it’s ample time he pays up. I mean, it should suite him, as he is such a law and order guy.

  • 4am@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Oh no, he’ll lose everything and become working class again! The death of a bourgeois! You can’t do this, judge! He’s supported to be protected by the system! 😱

    • chitak166@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I keep saying, making these people members of the working class is a fate worse than death in their eyes.

      So we should do it more often.

  • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s not like wealthy people ever go broke anyways. Look at Alex Jones, owes millions in judgments but is still spending to the tune of 100k a month, and still making million and is on tv, etc. How is that broke and how is he not being forced to live in a trailer park till his judgments are paid? Any one of us owes money, they’ll put you on the streets, literally, to get their money. But rich people get to go on being rich, even when they owe millions.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes, I understand why debtor’s prisons are a bad thing for poor people. But, it does make me wish that rich people could end up locked up if they were unable to pay debts, especially when the debts are the result of fraud, defamation, and other crimes against innocent people.

      Maybe sentence them to living in a halfway house with an ankle monitor on until they can pay what they owe. During the day they get to rant on their internet shows and try to drum up money. But, at night they have to report back to the halfway house and deal with their roommates and so-on.

      • chitak166@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean, why sentence them to anything? Seize their assets and garnish their wages until the debt is paid.

        It’s what happens to everyone else.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          That works for The Poors. But, rich people can easily get around that.

          “That Lamborghini? It’s not mine, it belongs to a corporation housed in the virgin islands which is owned by a numbered entity in Cyprus”

          “Income? I don’t have any. But, this foreign bank was willing to loan me $200 million, which I’ll definitely be repaying somehow.”

          “That expensive dinner in Paris? That was a gift from a close friend.”

          “That new flat screen TV? The non-profit I own is leasing it to me for $0 per month.”

        • 100_kg_90_de_belin @feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          They pay people to come up with ways to make them look penniless as far as the law is concerned.

          People like Alex Jones may actually have very little money in their name.

    • ohlaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They are better at hiding their money, tying it up in investments, trusts, LLC’s, etc. Most regular people don’t have shell companies to mask their assets.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m sure his great friend Donald Trump will be happy to make Rudy whole; it’s pocket change to the world’s richest man!

    [s/]

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    the time to consider whether you can serve the penalty for breaking the law is before you break the law, not after. if you don’t have tens of millions of dollars, don’t purposely cause tens of millions of dollars in damage.