• Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 个月前

      A square is a rectangle, but a rectangle isn’t necessarily a square

      Same with rhombus and diamond

      A rhombus is a diamond, but a diamond isn’t necessarily a rhombus

      Rhombus has to have four equal sides, a diamond does not.

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 个月前

        I think most people would say a 2D shape that they’d call a diamond would have 4 equal sides.

        I don’t think very many at all would call an elongated parallelogram a “diamond”.

        • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 个月前

          If I took a traditional diamond shape and elongated just the bottom sides.

          I feel like most would call it a diamond still. Specific term would be a kite. Many wouldn’t come up with that, though. It’s not an elongated parallelogram. It is not a rhombus.

          “Diamonds” on bicycle playing cards have curved edges. They are not a rhombus because sides are not parallel. Most agree that it’s the classic diamond shape, though.

          • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 个月前

            If you give someone paper and a pencil and ask them, “Please draw a diamond shape.”

            Most will draw a 4 sided shape with 4 equal sides.

            • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 个月前

              People would definitely want to elongate the top and bottom sides because they do not want to draw a sideways square, which is a rhombus, parallelogram, diamond too.

              There’s no way a human is going to draw 4 equal lines

              No one at the end is going to be like “yeah but you have to be sure all sides are equal” when they have some kind of weird kite shape.

              There’s people out there that wouldn’t count a sideways square as a diamond

              • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 个月前

                IDK why you think that “4 equal sides” is the same as “sideways square”.

                You can (and frequently do) have equal sided diamonds that aren’t “sideways squares”.

                Seems like your main issue is geometry.

                People would definitely want to elongate the top and bottom sides

                Which is fine. As long as they elongate symmetrically (which most would do), they’re still four equal sides.

                There’s no way a human is going to draw 4 equal lines

                Yes they would. In fact most would, I’d wager.

                Sounds like your concepts struggle is comprehending that “four equal sides” isn’t the same as “four equal vertices”.

                • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 个月前

                  There is no such thing as a diamond in geometry. The correct term is a rhombus.

                  That shape is a kite in geometry.

                  You ask 100 people what that shape is.

                  How many are going to say diamond?

                  Even the people that believe diamonds have all equal sides would say “It’s not a perfect diamond but it is diamond shaped”

                  Imagine saying “It’s not a perfect square, but it is square shaped” at a rectangle.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 个月前

          For me the shape I was thinking of was if you take a simplified 2D version of this 💎, with there being 4 sides, 2 pairs of equal sides but not 4 equal sides

          I imagine what people are talking about here is this ♦️ sort of diamond.

          I blame me not being a native speaker for thinking of diamon diamond

  • Signtist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 个月前

    Unless you live in North Dakota, where the Rhombus Guys pizza chain is located. Pretty good pizza, though overpriced.

  • ExaptationStation@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 个月前

    There’s a rhombus on my argyle sock There’s a rhombus on my argyle sweater There’s a rhombus, on that diamond back snake Rhombus, oh you’d better not pet her I saw a rhombus shaped kite flying up in the sky I saw a rhombus shaped marking on the head of a horse I saw a rhombus shaped sandwich at a fancy party And a rhombus shaped sign that said baby on board A rhombus is a diamond With all sides the same length BOT A: You can measure it You can ride a bus, but have you ever ridden rhombus? BOT A: This playing card has a diamond on it BOT B: I prefer to call it a rhombus BOT A: Go fish! See a rhombus on a jeweled crown Run a rhombus when you hit a home run With a rhombus you can draw a manta ray A rhombus is all kinds of fun! It’s a rhombus BOT A: You look nice in that argyle sweater BOT B: Thank you. It was a gift from the horse.

    Song by Storybots

  • Skates@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 个月前

    Okay chatgpt, pretend you’re a human trying to convey in one phrase that they have some level of mental disability. The phrase must be short, to convince me of your decreased attention span. Please use the words “elementary” and “rhombus”.

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 个月前

    Funny I just used it last night after having not used it since who knows when. Didn’t want to say parallelogram.