I am not a teen.

  • acetanilide@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’ve been saying this for so long. Don’t get me wrong, some films do make sense to have sex scenes. But there are so many that either have hardcore (for TV) sex scenes or just random full nudity that makes it nearly impossible to watch with anyone other than my partner or close friends.

    Like if I recommend a film or show to someone and completely forget that it had sex or even just nudity in it, it usually wasn’t important to the story. On the other hand, it may have made sense to include in the film but it was so terribly done that I promptly blocked it out.

    The other issue is that it has become increasingly difficult to find any shows that either don’t include sex scenes, or don’t have ridiculous levels of violence, or whatever else is difficult for me to deal with when I just want something easy to watch that’s not a kid’s movie (although kid’s movies have their own set of issues).

    Streaming services don’t even make it easy to find something to watch - they show you the same stuff over and over, or they pretend that everything is in English when they include so many other languages in the selections. If I am unable to pay attention to the captions then I would prefer to have something in English without trying a bunch of different shows first. I mean I guess this is partly (mainly?) my fault since I’ve failed to learn another language despite years of studying. But I think it just irritates me that they lie about it more than anything.

    Idk I am off topic now and this has turned into a really long comment that probably doesn’t say anything that hasn’t already been said in this thread.

  • manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Pandering to teenagers is how you end up with plotlines wrapping up like oh thankfully Wesley found a solution in the last five minutes

    Teenagers should be touching grass, or hucking loogies at cars, go outside and dig a hole or something, log off

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    47 minutes ago

    I can understand that now that we have access to easy-direct–instant-proper porn that sex scenes are less appealing to the majority of people.

    When I was a kid they would definitely include a sex scene just so that people looking to jerk off would be willing to watch or buy.

  • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    So I’ve noticed that there are a lot of streaming movies and TV shows that match a lot of these patterns:

    • IP is announced. Adaptation of extremely popular series with existing fanbase
    • IP is billed as “adult” with “mature themes”
    • Producer/Director goes on a podcast and compares IP to “Game of Thrones” a few weeks before release. Said comparison treats GoT as an ideal to aspire to instead of a cautionary tale.
    • Producer/Director also insults existing fanbase for some reason
    • IP is previewed to critics, gets amazing reviews
    • IP comes out, and gets high streaming numbers day one
    • Writing ends up being terrible
    • Plot ends up being surface level, with all the subtly of the original adaptation cut out. This somehow is true now matter how basic the source material may seem
    • Acting is terrible. There is at least one race swapped character, who they also butcher from a writing perspective
    • VFX is terrible, and expensive scenes are cut out
    • Costumes are terrible to the point where everything looks like shitty cosplay
    • There’s a few violent scenes that are extremely gratuitous. VFX and writing are so bad that it’s comical instead of jarring
    • There are a few random sex scenes thrown in. The sex scenes detract from the pacing of the story, and are blatantly thrown in so producers can brag about them
    • Sex scenes tend to focus on the female form. If men are involved, they all are hairless and look like boy band members
    • If it is a gay sex scene, it blatantly written by women and for women with an extremely limited knowledge of men as a whole
    • In a few days, the Internet erupts with needlessly vitriolic discourse about said IP.
    • A year post release, the show is essentially forgotten.

    In that context it’s no surprise younger people don’t like sex scenes. It’s basically a canary for a low quality show and extreme toxicity.

    • lousyd@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Are you taking about Uglies? I feel like you described Uglies. I liked the adaptation, but a lot of critics didn’t.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    49 minutes ago

    More confirmation the world is right to see us as backwards. (US study)

    So many sexual hangups. Makes sense considering we were founded by Puritans escaping to the new world to be more backwards and repressed.

    Sex is a part of life. A massive part of the human condition. A part to be celebrated, not mourned or minimized. That’s how we get pedophile priests and sexual education summed up in “do not do it because it does not exist and you’re dirty for asking.” It’s not Gen Zs fault though, social media is designed to emphasize the darkest possible side of everything as it gets clicks, so sex as a concept is just a vector of potential trauma to them.

    If only we had the same hangups about our violence boners our media gluts us on with abandon. Sports concussions, gory explosion movies, and our most celebrated exports tools of mass murder 😎👍. People giving one another physical pleasure 😱👎.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If I want to watch sex in a movie, I’ll watch a porno in my basement sex dungeon. If I want to watch something with family and friends without that weird awkward moment when SEX starts happening, I’ll watch a movie without a pointless sex scene in it.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I have noticed over the years sex scenes usually add no value to the movie. If the sex scene was removed completely it wouldn’t change the story at all.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah, while I do enjoy seeing occasional boobs (which most of the time aren’t even showed), if I want to watch sex, I’ll just put on some porn.

        IMO, The Room is one of the few movies where the sex scenes added anything. And even then, they didn’t add anything to the plot, they added to the meta plot, which was the story of a guy with a passionate vision but lacking the talent to pull off that vision, which IMO Wiseau does have talent doing, since he’s been able to recreate that same feeling in other content, making me think he’s playing a character (Tommy Wiseau the producer) he wants the audience to laugh at.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It’s the stupid toxic “romance” that I want rid of. It gets so boring and tedious to watch. If it’s important to the story, then fine. But otherwise can we just normalize friendship between opposite gendered people without the need for bad relationship drama, jealousy, and normalizing the idea that when someone says no, they’re actually just “playing hard to get”.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 hours ago

      can we just normalize friendship between opposite gendered people

      Great idea. I would love a prominent TV show to have main characters of the opposite sex that are good friends and a romance is never shoehorned into it at any point.

      Warehouse 13 got sooooo close.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’ve had that show recommended to me before and I keep avoiding it because the subject matter doesn’t interest me, but I keep being told to watch it despite that, so it is on my long list.

          • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            10 minutes ago

            I’m not sure what you think the subject matter is, but I was completely caught off guard. The main character is ostensibly in a “fish out of water” story, and that certainly creates a humorous backdrop. But the show is really all about mental health and wellbeing. People supporting each other while they learn to love themselves, deal with anxiety, trauma, and prejudice… It’s immensely beautiful, uproariously funny, and I will happily be the next person to recommend you watch it.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 hours ago

              It’s the sports part that held absolutely no interest to me because I think sports are really, really boring. But I’m told I’ll like it anyway, and you seem to back that up.

              • marquisalex@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                There are plenty of shows “about” subjects that you really don’t need to have any interest in to enjoy, because the show is actually about the characters. Like Succession, is any knowledge about or passion for corporate takeovers necessary? In Ted Lasso, the sport is there to motivate the characters, and is only very occasionally on screen.

      • Deway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Stargate SG1 did it as well or evem better than WH13 in my opinion. Sure Jack and Sam have some sort of romance but Teal’C, Sam, and Daniel are great friends. Atlantis did it even better with Ronon and Teyla.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah, but not all the characters on any show were hooking up with each other outside of soap opera stuff. There was still an idea that two of them will end up falling in love. Why does that need to be part of the show at all? Let them all have partners outside of work.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Honestly, Law & Order is good for this imo. Especially Benson and Stabler from SVU, and some of Criminal Intent with Vincent D’Onofrio and Kathryn Erna.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It makes sense. Sex scenes were interesting when we didn’t have on-hand porn streaming because it was something you didn’t see often. Nudity and sex are now so readily available that they aren’t exciting. As someone else said, just infer it.

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      It doesn’t make sense.

      Is it more interesting to see your girlfriend or boyfriend naked or in a sensual situation or porn? How about just someone you know?

      Extending this logic, it is more interesting to see someone you know in se(x/n)ual scenes from an acting perspective. Meaning, while it’s may not help the plot of every movie, I would say having these elements added by your favorite actor gives some pupil dilating special sauce that horny longdong and bouncy jangletits hardcore adventure does not provide.

    • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Just have the screen go black at a sex scene.

      “Pause here, go watch your favourite porn vid and come back. That’s what just happened.”

      A choose your own adventure!

  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I also noticed hollywood often depict a woman cheating on the man and the man forgiving it.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    My issue is that it’s almost always gratuitous now. I so rarely see a sex scene in a TV show or movie and think that it could have easily been skipped, but they felt the need to show an actress’ breasts and have her simulate an orgasm.

    I don’t get titillated by it. I have porn if I need that.

    I didn’t get past the first episode of Game of Thrones because I found all the sex and nudity too gratuitous for my tastes.

    I don’t think I’m a prude. I have no problem with sex scenes and nudity in films where they make sense. Basic Instinct wouldn’t make sense without them. Last Tango in Paris wouldn’t make sense without them. They’re both movies worth watching.

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 minutes ago

      You should suffer through it. The series is pretty primo. Books are good too, but season one is less time investment than book one and they run pretty parallel. Book two and season two… Different story.

    • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think, at least in the GoT example, sexual situations can be used to communicate a lot about the attitudes and culture around sex and nudity in the universe of the show or movie. It’s much more interesting than somebody saying, “Hey, person who already knows this: it’s considered normal for men to use brothels, isn’t it?”

      It’s much less interesting and necessary for something set in the “current” world, since the audience doesn’t need as much education in the social mores. However, it can make the work have better instructive longevity if it’s an accurate depiction of the time, since people fifty years in the future can watch and understand what was different.

      But I do agree that overall there has been a lot of gratuitous nudity and sex, just the same with violence, etc.

    • Krauerking
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You didn’t think it made sense in game of thrones?

      It’s olden days in a hostile world. All there is to do is have sex and die. What felt inaccurate to life about that?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        In the one episode I saw? No. It seemed almost entirely gratuitous. I don’t need to watch a prostitute sucking off Peter Dinklage to know he’s having sex with a bunch of prostitutes what with him already being in bed with them.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I often find sex scenes to be gratuitous and unnecessary, but I would never let sex prevent me from watching an amazing TV show or movie. I think that’s just foolish.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            When there are countless other good things to watch that don’t involve those? Why spend my time on the ones that do just because they’re also considered to be good? I won’t enjoy them as much, so obviously they won’t be as good for me as they are for others.

            I could be missing all kinds of amazing things to watch for all kinds of reasons. So could you. There’s only 24 hours in a day. You have to pick and choose.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Just a trivial and silly way to limit your exposure to different types of film/TV.

              A sex scene might make me take a point off of my score for a movie, but I’ve seen far too many flat out incredible movies/shows with unnecessary sex scenes to know just how much I’d be missing if I removed such a large chunk of content from the pool right off the bat like that.

              No thanks. I will watch something without regard for its sexual content, because I’m an adult. And then, if it turned out to have a gratuitous sex scene, that will factor into my opinion of the thing.

              The thing about gratuitous and unnecessary sex scenes is, by definition, they are unnecessary. So if you really care that much, why not just fast forward through them? You would miss nothing (otherwise it wouldn’t have been unnecessary).

              I recently watched “Jeanne Dielman…” after seeing it top the BFI Top 100 list. That movie has quite a bit of sex, but it was well worth the watch, and it would be a shame to have prevented myself from even having that opportunity because it contains sex.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                It wasn’t a sex scene in the case of the first episode of GoT.

                I don’t have a problem with a sex scene. Especially if it serves the plot.

                I literally said so at the beginning of this comment chain:

                I have no problem with sex scenes and nudity in films where they make sense. Basic Instinct wouldn’t make sense without them. Last Tango in Paris wouldn’t make sense without them. They’re both movies worth watching.

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  Yeah I understand that and agree that most sex scenes are unnecessary. And I am talking about movies and TV shows that are considered some of the greatest media ever created, that might happen to have unnecessary sex in it. I’m not going to arbitrarily limit myself and miss out on watching that stuff because there might be 90 seconds (of a 2+ hour film) of unnecessary sex. Again, because I’m an adult.

                  Using your example, you are missing out on one of the best stories ever told on television (until the last season at least), because the first episode of the show had sex in it that you found to be unnecessary (and btw, while most of the sex in that show is unnecessary, there is at least one or two *very important" sex scenes in season 1 that one might not recognize as being important… Yet).

                  As someone who read the books, I was able to tell which sex scenes were important, and which weren’t, but not all of it is unnecessary.

                  I understand your position, I just think it’s silly (and kind of sad).