In the end it doesn’t matter, since i uncontrollably zoidberg saluting 1 whenever is see either of them

  • borschtisgarbo@lemmygrad.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    The original corporate redesign

    Everyone uses this as if it is THE flag of the Soviet Union despite it not being used in 1917-55, which was the most pivotal era of the Union. Like what the fuck does the 55 flag have to it’s name? It didn’t experience ww2, it wasn’t triumphantly raised over the reichstag. Just a stupid attempt at ‘destalinization’, an attempt which discarded the flag under which tens of millions bled fighting against fascism. FUCK YOU KHRUSCHEV (love you for aiding natlib movements though ❤️ )

    • Lussy [any, hy/hym]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I like the latter ngl. Not saying I don’t like the original, or that I’m endorsing Kruschev, but I like that the space with just red is simply larger. Red as a color evokes a lot of emotion, and as symbolic the sickle and hammer are as communist icons, it’s more important to emphasize the natural strength of passion that binds all of us. Also prefer the less bubbly sickly and hammer of the latter.

      Lastly, I think the 2nd one works better as a unifying banner for world wide communism and the original is too provincial. Why? Fuck if I know. Edit: Actually, I think it’s because the original has a very Russian aesthetic, probably because of the more pronounced swoop of the sickle

      Will agree the original evokes a lot of WWII imagery