• UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 minutes ago

    People should be free to vote for who best represents them while still counting their vote if their preference didn’t win.

    Passing state level electoral reform will not only empower the creation of stronger 3rd parties, but also force the legacy political parties to have to compete and actually represent people.

    No more safe seats, no more hostage situation, no more voting while holding our noses, only democracy. More democracy was always going to be the solution to this problem. Who could possibly be against more democracy?

    Videos on Electoral Reform

    First Past The Post voting (What most states use now)

    Videos on alternative electoral systems we can try out.

    STAR voting

    Alternative vote

    Ranked Choice voting

    Range Voting

    Single Transferable Vote

    Mixed Member Proportional representation

    • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      While I agree that first past the post is the worst possible option, we need national reform as well.

      STAR or RCV has the potential to break the 2 party system where votes are counted, but it comes up short against the electoral college system. As long as the electoral college is how we choose our President we will only have 2 viable candidates and the parties will have elevated power to not only choose our candidates but to elevate their preferred down ballot candidates which hobbles alternative voting mechanisms.

      The electoral college combined with citizens United gives the parties practically unchecked power.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Whoa, either they’re incredibly unaware of the recent news in Gaza or this is quite mask off about their side and goals. “the moral stain of reelecting genocide”? Give me a fucking break, the conflict was self-resolving right before Trump’s inauguration. Now he’s fanning the flames.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Hey, look, it’s [90% of the people I argued with on Lemmy before election day]!

  • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’d take that as a confession to being complicit whenever we get to the US equivalent of the Nuremberg trials.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      Assuming he is sincere, then I’d assume that he would say that it’s not “their” protests at that point but the participation of others.

      Under Harris, they stay isolated without energized allies as most people are relieved with the status quo. They hope that Trump pushes things so far to perhaps even cancel elections and trigger a violent uprising that opens the door for them to ultimately win and that is their opportunity to finally replace the status quo. A very dangerous game where a more likely outcome is a far right authoritarian state with lots of suffering and lives at stake, but that’s a risk they are glad for everyone to take.

      You see this in their rhetoric, that it’s not their fault for failing to support a viable alternative to Trump, it’s everyone else’s fault for failing to agree with them, and maybe now everyone will learn their lesson and agree with them.

      I’ve had conversations with them and they hold that democracy is the wrong way. Essentially they think the citizenry are too stupid and/or lazy to decide how things should be governed. This is pretty much the horseshoe effect, both the far right and far left want to replace the democratic system with something else. If someone doesn’t 100% agree with them, they must be wrong and their perspective must be ignored, and democracy means actually trying to work with such people. So they prefer to take their chances with prodding a violent conflict since they’ve figured they can never win peacefully. If they can’t have the presidency, then who cares. No patience for capturing local and legislative offices.

      The far right was more effective strategically, playing the game until they could unleash. They played the game with the republican party according to the rules, and then won.

    • Freefall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Because trump won’t take over Gaza and turn it into a casino strip…hang on a minute…

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      you’d think that would be the obvious mindset people who “care about human dignity” would have, right?

    • Golden Lox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      i think their argument would be that conditions will materially worsen for a significant propirtion of the population, escalating the chances of the working class to become conscious of their chains.

      idk tho

  • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I am absolutely disgusted by this. Basically they are saying they intentionally and knowingly manipulated Palestinian Americans and pro-Palestinians into allowing a Trump victory and the doubling up of the growing threat of a trans, queer and POC genocide among much more violence.

    You may have different opinions from me about the third party voters and the culpability they carry, but I hope we all can agree that Jason Call and company here are blatantly evil and have blood on their hands.

    Hoping this can be a moment of reactionary leftist unity. Fuck every leader who actively worked towards MAGA. I’m doing my best to organize and do damage control, but not because some dumbass Jill Stein employee told me to. You should too.

    • gi1242@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      honestly, I have this nagging feeling that stein only runs to deliberately split the democratic vote. she knows exactly trumps position on Gaza, facism and capitalism. and she looks the other way either for personal gain, or because she supports trumps positions

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        If you have this feeling then you should be working to replace First-past-the-post voting in your state so splitting the vote isn’t a possibility.

      • Freefall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        She has been to many GOP backed events. It has been known for quite a while that she is run as a spoiler.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        i don’t thing it has to be a nagging feeling even :/ i think this tweet basically proves it

        i mean he basically says “yeah we did this so trump would win”

        like yeah it’s with veiled language but only about as veiled as musk’s “my heart goes out to you”

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Basically they are saying they intentionally and knowingly manipulated Palestinian Americans and pro-Palestinians into allowing a Trump victory and the doubling up of the growing threat of a trans, queer and POC genocide among much more violence.

      😳

      I’m not sure where you got all of that info. The tweet and article I read mentions none of what you listed him admitting to saying.

      I point this out not because I agree with him; I don’t. I point it out because these types of responses are misinformation, plain and simple. And we have enough of that from everyone else.

      We are to be held to a higher standard.

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It is not remotely misinformation.

        Your comment is by suggesting otherwise. If the Green party in the US were actually a serious party, they would be involved in more than just the presidential election.

        So please. Stop spreading lies that the Green party is anything but what they are. Stop pretending they didn’t contribute to the rise of fascism. Stop pretending they didn’t contribute to a Trump win.

        And most of all, don’t pretend that they didn’t know Trump would go all in on genocide.

        • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Stop spreading this misinformation, greens hold more offices than all other third parties combined in the US.

          • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            There is not one member of the green party holding a federal office.

            There is not one member of the green party currently holding a state office.

            It is not misinformation.

            • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Correct, however there’s more than a hundred in local offices. You people always say of they were serious they’d start from the bottom, grass roots. They’ve been doing that. Your post is misinformation created by your billionaire owners to dissuade any effective organizing in any way that would hurt them.

              • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 minutes ago

                “More than a hundred?” “In local offices?” Sweet! We’ve got over one hundred Green Party comptrollers! We’re saved!

              • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Utter and complete nonsense.

                They haven’t been doing it at all. They put all the money into the presidential election - which they can’t win - blatantly, and by their own admission across multiple years to take away from democrats.

                They are a spoiler party. Thats it.

                I have stated nothing but facts, and your response is “but billionaires exist” - what in the wild wild west are you even saying?

                Complete nonsensical garbage. Not interested. Goodbye.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I’m not referring to the Green Party. I’m referring to the commenter above me and I quoted the part of their comment that I’m referring to as misinformation.

  • Zahtu@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Remember, when the social democratic Part (SPD) and communist Party (KPD) of late Weimar republic Germany enabled the fascist government of Hitlers NSDAP in 1933. All because they were too focused on fighting each other, thinking that after Hitler, who is sure to fail, they will get greater voter turnout in their respective favor? Yeah, this here has the same vibes.

    Spoiler: they did not get their turn or voter turnout because there was no longer a German democratic state (just to make sure us-americans not well-versed in international history understand)

    • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      No, but I do remember the liberal government appointing Hitler because communism was considered more of violence than bigotry… But hey that breaks your point.

      • Zahtu@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It was the communist Party and the left workers party, so both Sides. Because they communist Party declared the left workers Party AS the enemy rather than the NSDAP, Same with the left workers Party.

        And yes to the commenter below, who also did Vote itself into government with Hitler were the conservatives back then.

        But Point is, both communist and left workers Party not uniting against Faschismus was the enabling factor for the dictatorship that followed.

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It’s hard to tell from just this one tweet, but this guy seems like he is actively trying to out-stupid trump.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      this was actually new to me, idk why. literally before today i was aware of the sentiment around stein but never felt i had enough information to come down either way.

      i guess now i know :(

      • Placebonickname@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Well, she’s a Doctor Who has absolutely no experience in law, foreign relations, or previously elected positions. So yeah, I wasn’t gonna vote for her anyway