• Whamburglar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    AI absolutely has the potential to enable great things that people want, but that’s completely outweighed by the way companies are developing them just for profit and for eliminating jobs

    Capitalism can ruin anything, but that doesn’t make the things it ruins intrinsically bad

    • Debs@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I used to be so excited about tech announcements. Like…I should be pumped for ai stuff. Now I immediately start thinking about how they are going to use the thing to turn a profit by screwing us over. Can they harvest data with it? Can they charge a subscription for that? I’m getting so jaded.

  • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Corporate is pushing AI. It’s laughably bad. They showed off this automated test writing platform from Meta. That utility, out of 100 runs, had a success rate of 25%. And they were touting how great it was. Entirely embarrassing.

  • regrub@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m so tired of these tech-bros trying to convince everyone that we need AI

    • Tabooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      People said the same things about the Internet when it came out and calculators before that

      • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        “When I was young, they told me that AI would do the menial labor so that we could spend more time doing the things we love, like making music, painting, and writing poetry. Today, the AI makes music, paints pictures, and writes poetry so that I can work longer hours at my menial labor job.”

        AI bros are like pro-lifers, straw-manning an argument nobody is making.

        • Tabooki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I didn’t use it for those things but I do use it every day for a multitude of tasks. For myself I use it far more than Google itself.

          • Which is absolutely hilarious to me given how often it hallucinates answers.

            I recently tried ChatGPT as a Google alternative. It looked very impressive as it found things based on the slightest of clues. Except that literally everything it found was made up. It “found” a movie quote by Orson Welles that was never quoted. It “found” a song by an artist that said artist never released. It “found” an album by a group released four years before said group’s first release.

            If you’re using ChatGPT as a Google replacement you are being dangerously misinformed by a degenerative “AI” that speaks with the certitude of a techbrodude.

                • Tabooki@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Or possibly it will help us solve the energy issues. It’s already lead to some revolutionary discoveries in propulsion and many other areas. It really is far more than something to chat with and to think otherwise is just silly. I use it to to code, brainstorm and developer with. Al systems can process massive amounts of data, recognizing patterns and improving their performance over time. This has helped things like the medical field immensely. Especially with early detection of cancers etc. Trying to be a luddites won’t stop it. Might as well embrace and extend it for the betterment of all.

            • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              for generating filler text and in general making things more formal it can do a good job, yes you do need to review it’s output, but that beats needing to write the whole thing in a less hostile tone.

          • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            But these are the things people are complaining about - not AI itself, but the people making it, the reasons that they’re making it, and the consequences that that is having on the human condition.

            For your example, people don’t complain about it making Google obsolete or something, but about the fact that LLMs like ChatGPT are wrong about 53% of the time and often completely make stuff up, and that the companies making and pushing them as a replacement for search engines have collectively shrugged their shoulders and literally said “there’s nothing we can do to prevent it” when asked about these “hallucinations” as they call them.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The world is a wildly different place now, and the people developing them were headed by people motivated by reasons other than extracting as much money out of the world at any cost.

        This is not nearly as comparable.


        Beyond that, very few people had an issue with AI as fuzzy logic and machine learning. Those techniques were already in wide use all over the place to great success.

        The term has been co-opted by the generative, largely LLM folks to oversell the product they are offering as having some form of intelligence. They then pivot to marketing it as a solution to the problem of having to pay people to talk, write, or create visual or audio media.

        Generally, people aren’t against using AI to simulate countless permutations of motorcycle frame designs to help discover the most optimal one. They’re against wholesale reduction in soft skill and art/content creation jobs by replacing people with tools that are definitively not fit to task.

        Pushback against non-generative AI, such as self-driving cars, is general fatigue at being sold something not fit to task and being told that calling it out is being against a hypothetical future.

      • TommySoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah and people also said the same thing about NFTs and now they barely exist. If there was a use for AI outside of very specific things I’d agree with you. But the uses for AI are very basic when comparing it to the Internet.

        • Tabooki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nobody said that about nfts. Maybe s couple of foolish kids and shysters but nobody ever took them seriously.

          • TommySoda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Maybe later on, but in the beginning everyone was hyping NFTs and companies were trying thousands of different ways to put NFTs onto their platform. The only difference is what side you are on.

            I’m not saying NFTs are like AI. AI has actual potential. I’m just saying lot of technologies are more hype than substance. My life has changed zero percent since AI came out. If anything it’s been more annoying and made things like Internet searches more frustrating. And when I saw that new ad for Google Gemini as they vaguely tell you what it can even do or be used for, the same thought came to my mind, “Yeah, but what is it even for? Do you guys even know?”

            • Tabooki@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s for whatever you want to use it for. Personally I use it continuously. Googling and just getting a bunch of links to shift through is a waste of time and money.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      As with anything, hating on AI is a spectrum. It’s a love-hate relationship for me.

  • capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Lemmy

    Edit: Oh shit. I didn’t realize this whole community is just for this… oh well.

  • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ethical

    AI tools aren’t inherently unethical, and even the ones that use models with data provenance concerns (e.g., a tool that uses Stable Diffusion models) aren’t any less ethical than many other things that we never think twice about. They certainly aren’t any less ethical than tools that use Google services (Google Analytics, Firebase, etc).

    There are ethical concerns with many AI tools and with the creation of AI models. More importantly, there are ethical concerns with certain uses of AI tools. For example, I think that it is unethical for a company to reduce the number of artists they hire / commission because of AI. It’s unethical to create nonconsensual deepfakes, whether for pornography, propaganda, or fraud.

    Environmentally sustainable

    At least people are making efforts to improve sustainability. https://hbr.org/2024/07/the-uneven-distribution-of-ais-environmental-impacts

    That said, while AI does have energy a lot of the comments I’ve read about AI’s energy usage are flat out wrong.

    Great things

    Depends on whom you ask, but “Great” is such a subjective adjective here that it doesn’t make sense to consider it one way or the other.

    things that people want

    Obviously people want the things that AI tools create. If they didn’t, they wouldn’t use them.

    well-meaning

    Excuse me, Sam Altman is a stand-up guy and I will not have you besmirching his name /s

    Honestly my main complaint with this line is the implication that the people behind non-AI tools are any more well-meaning. I’m sure some are, but I can say the same with regard to AI. And in either case, the engineers and testers and project managers and everyone actually implementing the technology and trying to earn a paycheck? They’re well-meaning, for the most part.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The AI has a huge beneficial for drug development however. Iirc AI has synthesised a stronger version of one of the antibiotics.

  • spookex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Speak for yourself, ai generating porn is the greatest thing since sliced bread

  • potatar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ah! I thought you guys wanted cheap, fast, and most importantly interpretable cell state determination from single cell sequencing data. My bad.

      • xionzui@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        On the environmental question, AI tools are energy agnostic. If humans using electricity can be environmentally sustainable at all, so can AI. I suspect the energy requirements are going to drop drastically as more specialized hardware is developed.

        There are already a lot of great things they can do in the category of generating content for enjoyment. Both art and text based. One of the most popular twitch streamers uses a language model. Games and interactive experiences can be much more realistic and responsive now. As far as I can tell, a lot of people are benefiting from the ability to ask a question and get an expert level answer on most topics that is correct at least half the time. And this is just the infancy of the technology.

        As far as well meaning people, a lot of people working on the technology are researchers and computer scientists who legitimately believe in the potential for good of the technology. Of course, there are people who don’t care and only want profit also, but that’s true of basically every company. So you could probably accurately say it’s being worked on by any type of person in that spectrum, but you can’t say the opposite and deny that well meaning people are creating it.