• PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    The dems failed to convince enough people to vote for them. The largest share of votes in the last election was for no-one. Your primary job as a political party is to convince people to vote for you. if they can’t get people motivated in the face of bare faced fascism then they need to take a serious look at why their policies do not speak to americans.

    Very few people who voted for Kamala weren’t voting FOR Kamala… they were voting AGAINST Trump

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 minutes ago

    Realistically, it’s the Democrats who failed the voting public. Their campaign of “We offer you nothing!”, did not seem to drag in very many undecided voters. You and I might be very politically active, but the majority of Americans are not.

    You need to give them a reason to go out and vote. A lot of people have very short attention spans, and easily forgot how bad Trump was the first time around and shaming the people for their shortsightedness is not how you win elections.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    The number of excuses people are willing to make for Democrats is astounding. I’ve been watching the Republicans obstruct the Democrats for the last sixteen years. Meanwhile, Trump has been in power for a month, and Democrats are fast-tracking his appointments, even when it’s a conspiracy theorist to lead the FBI or an anti-vaxer to head HHS. They’ve given unanimous consent to Trump’s agenda 345 times so far. You should be calling them every day and demanding they act like an actual opposition party, not justifying their collaboration with the fascists. Who knows, maybe if they show voters that they’re actually willing to stand up and fight for something, they might actually win a fucking election.

  • thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    fuck it. I voted dem every election and they did fuckall. We got obamacare, whoop deee doo. we have to buy insurance now. fat load of good that did.

    Fuck the dems. I’m leaving and voting for some other party, and you should too. campaigning for a third party should start right fucking now, so the dems can’t say “oH, ThE TiMe FoR SuPpOrTiNg a ThIrD pArTy IsN’t 5 MoNtHs BeFoRe An ElEcTIoN!” Fuck you, you goddamned fake ass left party.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      Yes! This is the time to campaign for a third party, or put forward more progressive Democrats, or take a short-sighted meaningless stance on a genocide being done by someone else somewhere else.

      However, 2 years from now, in November, you need to vote for the candidate that is most able to win against the fascist ass-kissing trump sycophant, even if they aren’t a 100% match for your political views or objectives.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        or put forward more progressive Democrats,

        Beat this drum.

        SHOW UP TO THE FUCKING PRIMARIES.

        I remember it being fucking dead in my polling place back in 2020 for the primaries compared to the general.

  • Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Democrats

    Not opposing Trump, because unlike the last 40 years, we learn that a party has to have a super-majority in a government body to stop the opposing party from doing everything they want all the time.

    How could non-voters do this.

    • lutillian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m not sure we can attribute this inaction to much more than the established Democrats actually stand to personally benefit from these policies. They don’t really have a reason to push back because their donors are the same people in most cases (there are a few exceptions) and so many of them have the same level of gerrymandering and name recognition in their districts as the opposition.

      This is not a statement that both parties are the same. They demonstratively are not as Democrats won’t typically be the ones to enact these policies but they also don’t really have a reason to stop them either since things like the tax breaks personally benefit them.

  • skaarl@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Is the Democrat master plan to have a one party system? Everyone always and only vote Democrat, because if the other party of a two party system ever gets in to power we are screwed! It doesn’t sound like a good plan.

    You guys had a good idea with Ross Perot in 1992. Look into that (especially how he got 0 electoral college votes) and maybe you’ll have a better idea of what you should be doing, instead of blaming each other.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Now is exactly the right time to criticize the dems, make them step up their game. Would be better 4 years ago, but here we are.

    • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Www.indivisible.org is doing some good work getting on democratic “leaders” asses to do something. They also have something called the Payback Project. They are making a public list of all of those who do nothing during this administration and will use funds to buy ads during election time showing what that specific Democrat did or didn’t do.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The Dems are a minority in both the House and the Senate at the moment, they’re literally powerless.
      The best time to criticize them would have been over the last two years, when they actually could have done something about the mess.

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 minute ago

        Being in the minority never stopped the republicans. There are things the democrats can do to obstruct.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        Now is a great time to criticize them for their past actions and current attitudes, but a poor time to expect protection from them, on account of their minority position in the government.

      • Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        The Republicans seem to be able to stop a lot of things, especially if the opposing party not only doesn’t control every branch of government, but doesn’t have a 60+ majority of the senate with a comfortable margin to write off the {Manchins, Sinemas, Libermans, etc.}. But now suddenly a minority party can’t stop their opponents from doing things, even if it is blatantly unconstitutional? It seems like the Democrats are never playing to win.

        In reality, the Democrats want this all to continue, because if Trump fucks things up enough and destroys things enough, the Democrats only appeal of “we aren’t the Republicans” can for once, become a winning strategy in 2026/2028.

        • caffinatedone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That’s the key “stops a lot of things”. The way that Congress is structured makes it pretty easy to stop things since there are many choke points. Notice that republicans aren’t really trying to “do things” in Congress?

          The current issues and actions are being driven by the executive branch where they’re ignoring the law and constitution . Being in the minority in Congress means that Dems can’t trigger investigations or much of anything to formally push back unless they’re joined by some republicans.

          I’ll agree that they could make more noise and should block things up more than they’re doing presently, but these actions wouldn’t really stop or significantly slow any of this.

          I’m sick of the green lanterism that gets trotted out to suggest that they’re not stopping things because they don’t want to. Voters didn’t give them power in the last election, so we’re working from a position of weakness.

          • Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            There are still veto points and lawsuits to be made. Along with the more vocal opposition that you admit that they should engage in. It is neither that they could perfectly stop everything, but that they could actually start trying. The Democrats decided that they should sit back because if Trump fucks things up enough, they will have an easy time in 2026/2028, without changing their usual platform of “We are not the Republicans, we will give you nothing else”.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    They should like… Be politicians though. We get they can’t pass legislation, but be fucking politicians.

    Republicans out of the majority make you sniff their shit daily and are all over the news cycle. Democrats seem to think it’s ok to just say they’re concerned and send me fundraising emails.

  • Rin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    In American politics, it doesn’t matter who you vote for, you’re still getting fucked! Like choosing a broom and a stick to get fucked with.

    what needs to change is the way that voting work. Or at least people to vote for someone less embarassing than Harris and less facist than trump and a lot less in favor of the capitalists in general (Bernie my beloved).

      • thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        they didn’t let him win the primary. they had their chosen candidate, and they weren’t going to let an actual progressive win.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              33 minutes ago

              Tell me more about how results that aligned with every major poll were totally unexpected. Every polling organization in the country conspired against Bernie.

              I voted for Bernie. I marched for Bernie, back when I had two good legs. I donated and campaigned for Bernie. I would’ve loved it if Bernie won.

              But he didn’t. Because the people who showed up to vote clung to the idea that a ‘moderate’ was a better shot in the general election.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Second highest voter turn out for a presidential election in US history.

    Clearly its the voters fault…

    Also why in the broken nation is the assumption that if more people showed up they would have voted like you? I never got this concept. Please spend more effort being an opposition/resistance and less being poor losers.

    • skaarl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      It is pathetic that among high voter suppression (due to Republican motions) the Democrats blame the people for not voting, instead of blaming voter suppression, or any of the other decades worth of inaction by Democrats to foresee and prepare for this. They have a two party system, it’s not like the Republicans were a complete surprise

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Millions of people who voted for Biden in 2020 didn’t show up to vote for Harris in 2024.

      Trump’s numbers barely changed at all between the two.

      • lemminator@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        And I can’t say that I blame them. Biden’s presidency… or his campaign… or Harris’ campaign…

        It was a shit-show all the way through. Maybe next time the Democrats should try catering to their voter base.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          40 minutes ago

          And I can’t say that I blame them.

          “I know fascism is bad, but I understand allowing it - I mean, look how uninspired the other option was!”

          Yeah, this is exactly why we’re in this position.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          19 Million primary voters picked Biden in 2024.

          He won the primary, as has every incumbent for many many decades.

          We failed them, not the other way around.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It doesn’t imply anything, it’s a fact that Voters chose fascism and now they’re facing the consequences.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I hate the us government as much as the next invasion target, but this stupid tribalism has gotten out of hand. Was this the inevitable result of a two party system (a joke pretending to be a democracy)? Maybe, but the very idea that I am expected to “pick a side” even as a outsider and that once I do half of the us will write me off is laughable.

        America, you did this. Stop trying to make it someone else’s fault.

        If we are to assume that there was voting suppression, do something about it!

        If we are to assume that there was voting fraud, do something about it!

        If we are to assume that the majority of americans did not want the current administration, then do something about it!

        This should be a no brainier if you have the majority of americans against this then you should have the will and ability to do something about it.
        But you clearly don’t have the majority of your nations people behind you in this, most likely don’t care enough (a side effect of that two party system) or and this might shock you, that the majority of americans are really just that awful and want to watch the free world burn.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Why did you cut out the VEP? The very next column…

        it stands for Voting Eligible Population by the way.

        Edit, for those not willing to click a link here is the picture not cut off:

        Notice how there are 3 measurements of voter turn out? Two of which show this to have been the second highest turn out? Now does this show a larger then there should be level of disenfranchisement? Yes, so fix that!

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I cut off the VEP because I mistook the voting age population for the voting eligible population and now that you pointed that out (thank you by the way) I’m looking into why there’s such a difference between those two numbers.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Its people that have lost the right/ability to vote. Most likely due to the terrible american for profit prison system.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 hours ago

                It was not included before it was invented, it was also not needed as the level of voter disenfranchisement was not yet an issue. It is now the standard metric (since you guys have so many people that are barred from voting).

  • 3x7x37@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Second highest turnout in history, but yeah, the non voters are the real issue here. Libs are so privileged they can’t even imagine people living from paycheck to paycheck. “Just vote, you losing your job and becoming homeless is worth it for democracy”.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It only works in aggregate. Like how a drop of water won’t quench anyone’s thirst, but a 20 gallon barrel generally will.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          45
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          16 hours ago

          One person puts in all the work

          Five people don’t

          Everyone fails

          :) :) :) :) :)

          (please kill me)

          • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            One thing I learned early in my academic career was that if I wanted a good grade on a group project it was easier to just do everything myself.

            The sooner I can fuck off to the middle of nowhere and not deal with any of you anymore the better.

      • Botzo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I thought the system was to dump the barrel out at the top of a hill so you can proclaim how much you’re doing for the thirsty person at the bottom.

        Trickle down, but for voting too!

        Oh, and I guess that’s what Trump literally did with the water in California, except they were different hills altogether.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      A third of the eligible voters didn’t vote. If they had, this tiny marginal bullshit wouldn’t matter.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        Assuming that the third would be biased toward one candidate rather than being probably just as evenly divided as those that did vote.

        We know the restrictive voting laws were biased. We do not know that the “didn’t bother to vote” has the same bias.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 minutes ago

        Beyond the statistical realities that Saleh mention, the general point about drop-off is also weird.

        It implies that the GOP cheated, but declined to cheat in down ballot. This seems odd, if they had the will and capability to just change the votes, why would they skip the down ballot elections? Further another similar site pointed out the drop-off was uneven, that it was suspiciously higher in Montana than Michigan. To imply the GOP cheated more in Montana? When your theory indicates a bigger effort to cheat in a safe state than a swing state, then there’s something going on.

        The drop-off effect is easily explained by the reality that people weren’t voting for a Republican or a Democrat, they were voting for or against Trump. That mindset is wholly separate from Republican v. Democrat. It’s almost an Apples v. Oranges to try to compare a race with Trump to it to any other race (which is why the GOP is desperate to run him again, because even they don’t understand how he engages the base and he is a useful idiot).

        I’m glad to see it investigated and I wish that the voting populace didn’t do what they did (and accept that without the suppression, the results might have gone the other way). However I don’t think fraud has been proven in any significant degree.

        Perhaps the democrats should emphasize vote in person on election day if at all possible, and mail-in is a last resort, rather than saying “voting is easy, just mail it in”. It’s obvious that they are having great success in discarding legitimate mail-in ballots the way they see fit.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This is bullshit and this group is likely just out there to cash in on the election. What they claim to be suspicious patterns is just basic statistics.

        If machines have a higher number of votes it is just to be expected that the spread of the results get smaller and towards the end result. The larger the sample size, the smaller the spread.

        And the early voting machines had up to 250 votes per machine, whereas the election day machines only had around 125. At least in the graphics this group used in their own report. If you scale the graphic of the early machines only until 125 votes per machine they look similar.

        Also on election day there were about 3000 machines as opposed to 1000. And here another basic truth comes up. If you repeat a sampling more often, the distribution of results becomes more even.

        These guys are just describing basic statistic effects and claiming them to be suspicious, probably to collect donations and run with the money. Also their website is dubious about who they are exactly and what their credentials are.

        There is legitimate criticisms and leads to investigate, but these guys are not one of them.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            i am not saying that there is no credible reasons to investigate if the election was done properly. however the “electiontruth” people do not provide any credible information for that. Also the video you linked does not seem to be about making a calm and proper argument, but rather to rile people up.

            Again it is not impossible, that there have been irregularities, but it is something that needs to be analyzed and discussed properly. This is irrespective from needing to resist the Trump government, as it is a bunch of cirminals.

  • Heyting@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    Nederlands
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Political parties are supposed to appeal to voters, not the other way around. Will post this again since people still don’t get it:

    Directing the attention towards the voters instead of the democratic party is a deliberate tactic to create division among the working class. The democratic party has way more power than your neighbour who didn’t vote. Getting angry at your neighbour will only alienate them further. It’s a waste of energy.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      This ignores a very important thing: The Republicans get their votes by lying their asses off to their base. I have no doubt the DNC has the money to pay enough people to figure out the perfect lie to tell every single person here to get their vote, but no one here wants that. Short of lies, they’d have to go with their original strategy: big tent compromise. And that’s means hard left compromising with centrists, and we all know that won’t happen.

      So what’s left? Abandon the middle? You’ll just shift the non-voting demographic around.

      Maybe if the far left could organize its own political movement, but that would require “the left” to operate as a unified group, which just by looking at all the infighting here, is obviously never going to happen.

      So we have a left that won’t compromise, a middle that isn’t big enough to win an election, and a hard right party going full send on misinformation, voter suppression, etc.

      And the largest group of eligible voters…doesn’t.

      Yeah, the answer here isn’t “the DNC changing their shit”, it’s figuring out how to get people to give a shit about voting again.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The Democrats literally campaigned with lifelong Republican leaders and doubled down on supplying a Genocide. It’s not the left that’s refusing to compromise.

        And this is all apologia for the Democrats trying to blame voters for the failure of the Democratic Party

      • Heyting@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        Nederlands
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        No this is all bs. Democrats abandoned it’s left-leaning voterbase by appealing to their donors and changing their campaign message from focusing on combatting wealth inequality and attacking the weird antitrans rhetoric to working together with republicans (???) and amplifying racist xenophobic rethoric more by constantly talking about how bad immigrants are. And of course not to forget their absolute refusal to end the genocide they were funding and sending Bill fucking Clinton to Michigan to berate Palestinians for caring about their families and friends being killed because they deserve it after Oct 7.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        There’s no room for our system to allow a third party in. They’ll just be crushed by the two other parties. It’s a rigged system. Money wins. No other party will have the money to win state votes and keep them.

        • _stranger_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          It’s not rigged, it’s just the inevitable stable state of the system. The US will have to move to a different voting system for third parties to matter.

        • illumrial@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          If you get enough actual leftist 3rd party House and congresspeople in, Dems have to make alliances with them.

          • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            So your plan is to defeat democrats in democrat states going up against all the campaign funds that the democrats will provide to beat this third party; and then you think once they’re congress you think democrats are going to vote with them to get lefty stuff to pass that will make this new leftist party look good?

            Hey, man. I’ve got some magic beans to sell you.

            • illumrial@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              False assumption to think that third party can just unseat Democrats. Also, the Dems had more money than God during the last election and couldn’t beat Trump. Also, Dems consistently neuter their own “leftist” bills (such as the green new deal) before they’re even out of committee so I don’t think they’re going to actually improve anything materially for me.

              You don’t need to use the whole magic beans sneering talk with me, dude, we probably have the same interests at heart.

      • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I hope people mass dying, losing every benefit of a society, and the chaos will get people to vote.

        Stupid fucks.

        • Kalysta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          As the republicans make it harder and harder to vote?

          Stop blaming voters and start blaming the systems of oppression that make it impossible for us to make our voices heard. How many people were purged from voter rolls in Georgia alone this election?

          • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            37 minutes ago

            Problem is everyone who knew they were going to pull this shit said they would do it.

            We all said: check your registration every month, then daily a few weeks out of the election. Keep on top of that shit.

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    making it difficult to vote is a feature not a bug.

    The question isn’t why are they not doing anything but why didn’t they do anything when they had the chance.

    • Caffeinated_Sloth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Obama had the house and senate his first term and all we got was shitty healthcare and drone bombing wedding receptions. We need a new opposition party.

      • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Oh and the Dodd-Frank act regulating Wallstreet. And saving the economy from the massive financial crash with the Recovery Act. And an act that extended how long after being fired someone can file for unemployment. And new tax legislation that had tax increases to help pay for the investment in the economy with the recovery act. And around 50 other pieces of legislation.

        Plus the “shitty health care” you mentioned mandated insurance companies have to cover people with pre-existing conditions giving insurance to tens of millions of people. And extended Medicaid to tens of millions of people providing relatively cheap medical care by comparison to before. Free? No. But many went from having bills of multiple hundreds a month to just 50. Again, perfect? No. But a massive fucking improvement.

        All that in the 2 years he had both houses. Not his entire first term. Much of it was incredibly influential even if not perfect. To say we got nothing out of it is misrepresenting both what we got and what we had before.

        Edit: and increasing the minimum wage.

        • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          All that in the 2 years he had both houses

          And they had a filibuster proof majority in the Senate for a whopping 2 months.

          • PunnyName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            15 hours ago

            So stop blaming Democrats who have been actively trying to improve things, and blame the Republicans who have been, and actively are RIGHT NOW, destroying things.

              • PunnyName@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                15 hours ago

                That includes the fucking voters, you know.

                Try to backpedal with your self sabotage now, motherfuckers.

                • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  The DNC lit a billion dollars on fire to lose to a racist rapist again. The “adults in the room” couldn’t beat a semi-literate buffoon. AGAIN.

                  Voters should have voted, yeah, but in more civilized cultures the folks at the DNC would have fallen on their swords.

          • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            Well a major influence on that is because people keep voting for Republicans even when Democrats have progressive policies on their platforms. Republicans winning the House in 2010 kneecapped every single thing the Democrats had been striving for. 2010 had the lowest turn out for a midterm in decades. Often because of people on the left blaming Obama for not fixing everything right away, or because there is a depressingly large population of the country that don’t even know midterms exist.

            Republicans fuck everything over, and people keep voting for them. Democrats don’t fix everything right away, and people refuse to vote for them. Such is the stupidity of the American public.

            • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              Democrats are also completely unprepared when they do have power. Where’s their project 2027? Why do they dilly dally and prevaricate when they know they have zero time to do anything?

              And why do they constantly insist on playing nice? Republicans have been assholes my entire life and Democrats refuse to acknowledge this.

              A political party that can only get power for four months out of forty years is broken and should be berated out of existence.

              • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Are they unprepared though? Because every time they get full power they get shit done. Not as much as would be ideal but they still do stuff. And they also would have passed multiple more things in 21-22 if they had been given more seats in the Senate, having a 50-50 Senate made it only possible to get some things done not everything, they could have played dirty and gotten more done. For instance they weren’t able to pass their Voting reform bill that had passed the House and would drastically have changed and improved how we vote. But it’s still BS to say they don’t get anything done. That’s literally far right propaganda that has become so pervasive it convinces people on both sides that the Democrats are useless and never do anything.

                That said, about Project 2025. It was put together by the Heritage Foundation. A think tank that does its work and puts it out for free. They’re backed by right wing billionaires. So the Republican party didn’t make it, despite it being their platform. Also wouldn’t it be Project 2029 for theirs since 2027 is a midterm and the whole point for that is to obstruct and do oversight on trump and his administration by having any power again. That said again. They don’t have the massive far right billionaires driving the equivalent of a Project 2025 and democratic voters also frequently argue against Billionaires driving something like that. Project 2025 is successful because all the work was done by Heritage.

                Also also, I 100% agree that it’s insane they keep playing nice. They have to play dirty and that means breaking some rules which they seem unwilling to do.

                But they are put into power by the Voters and then punished by the Voters despite doing significant legislation and improving the country when they get full power. So them not being able to take power for as much time as republicans has to do with the voters and the Republicans cheating with gerrymandering and voter suppression. And general Republican propaganda destroying the system.

                But even this last Election Harris wanted to increase the minimum wage, wanted to put caps on rent increases, wanted to give first time home buyers 25,000 down payment assistance, wanted to legalize weed, wanted to introduce an Unrealized gains tax on people who have stock portfolios bigger than 100 million, increasing the corporate tax rate, talking about actually trying to punish companies who engage in shrinkflation. She had progressive policies on her platform, but instead of Democrats going out and voting and the progressive legislation driving people to the polls, everyone summarized her as only ever being not-Tump and them being the same and some saying she even had no policies. Democrats have things they campaign on, but the Voters say no. Mainly because the left doesn’t vote, or split their vote, and the right ALWAYS votes.

                Personally, I’m not saying the Democrats can’t or shouldn’t be better, I think the party needs to be drastically reformed and we need to primary and kick out the older generation and we need more progressives who can talk more like real people. But I’m also trying to be fair about how things actually happen when they are in power.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Obama had a filibuster proof majority for a grand total of 73 days and they did Obamacare. Dems haven’t had that since.

        • ProvableGecko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Get rid of filibuster. Pack the supreme court. Do whatever you have to do to do what is in the benefit of the public. It ain’t that hard, it is very popular but the democratic party is just not interested in working for the people.

          • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I’m not sure I agree with that. Before suggesting someone wield that kind of power, consider how you’d feel about it if the opposition parties did that too.

            At this point, I think the USA is better off just reforming its constitution. And possibly splitting the union into 5-10 separate smaller countries. The country is clearly not an effective union anymore, and to be honest, hasn’t been for a very long time. This isn’t the first time there’s been a north-south divide and it certainly won’t be the last, so why prolong the suffering? Just break it up and be done with it. Everyone will probably be much happier that way.

            • thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              the fascist party has already done that. I’m not against taking off the gloves if the other guy is coming at me with a fucking knife.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It ain’t that hard, it is very popular but the democratic party is just not interested in working for the people.

            It sure as shit was not popular in 2009. It’s not even popular now.

            Most people don’t know jack fucking shit.

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        He had a filibuster-proof majority for a handful of weeks, and we got better healthcare than what was already on the table. While it’s not great healthcare, it’s still better than before.

        That included some staunchly conservative Democrats, by the by. Many of whom were ultra “pro-life”, which means abortion rights weren’t gonna happen.

        Additionally, people who mention drone strikes fail to a) recognize the tech was relatively new, but not so new that it was actually affordable to the DOD, and b) each president after has had more drone strikes.

        But let’s not let facts get in the way of our outage or anything.